Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1971 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 41.
61. lappuse
... testimony in chief , and in which the other party shall complete the testimony on his side , and a further time in which the junior party may take rebutting testimony , but he shall take no other testimony . If there be more than two ...
... testimony in chief , and in which the other party shall complete the testimony on his side , and a further time in which the junior party may take rebutting testimony , but he shall take no other testimony . If there be more than two ...
65. lappuse
An applicant cannot establish the requisite facts by his testimony alone . ' And his notes of themselves do not suffice . Credible oral testimony of other persons will do . But it must be factually specific.3 The evidence should ...
An applicant cannot establish the requisite facts by his testimony alone . ' And his notes of themselves do not suffice . Credible oral testimony of other persons will do . But it must be factually specific.3 The evidence should ...
78. lappuse
... testimony of each party , and a remedy for refusal to file are found in Rules 253 , 273 , 274 , 276 , 277 , and 278.2 Inspection of testimony after filing of it in the Patent Office is provided by Rule 279 . Official records and printed ...
... testimony of each party , and a remedy for refusal to file are found in Rules 253 , 273 , 274 , 276 , 277 , and 278.2 Inspection of testimony after filing of it in the Patent Office is provided by Rule 279 . Official records and printed ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting estoppel F 2d F.Supp ference infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer Terminal Disclaimer tion unpatentable ССРА