Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1971 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 14.
35. lappuse
... specified in the notice , not less than thirty days , unless cause be shown why such action should not be taken . Any response made during the specified period will be considered by a Board of Patent Interferences without an oral ...
... specified in the notice , not less than thirty days , unless cause be shown why such action should not be taken . Any response made during the specified period will be considered by a Board of Patent Interferences without an oral ...
85. lappuse
... specified herein after such decision , nor any proceedings on such peti- tion shall operate to extend the period of sixty days hereinabove provided . The times specified herein are calendar days . If the last day of the time specified ...
... specified herein after such decision , nor any proceedings on such peti- tion shall operate to extend the period of sixty days hereinabove provided . The times specified herein are calendar days . If the last day of the time specified ...
96. lappuse
... specified , under Rule 256 . 12. Request for recommendation by Board of Patent In- terferences , under Rule 259 . 13. Petition for rehearing reconsideration , or modifica- tion of decision , within thirty days , under Rule 256 . 14 ...
... specified , under Rule 256 . 12. Request for recommendation by Board of Patent In- terferences , under Rule 259 . 13. Petition for rehearing reconsideration , or modifica- tion of decision , within thirty days , under Rule 256 . 14 ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting estoppel F 2d F.Supp ference infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer Terminal Disclaimer tion unpatentable ССРА