Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1971 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 18.
10. lappuse
... showing is subject to exami- nation by the Board under new Rule 228 , which prescribes procedure leading to summary judgment against appli- cant if the showing be deemed insufficient . It is a condition precedent to the declaration of ...
... showing is subject to exami- nation by the Board under new Rule 228 , which prescribes procedure leading to summary judgment against appli- cant if the showing be deemed insufficient . It is a condition precedent to the declaration of ...
35. lappuse
... showing under rule 204 ( c ) , such showing will be ex- amined by an Examiner of Interferences . If the Ex- aminer considers that the facts set out in the showing provide sufficient basis for the interference to proceed , the ...
... showing under rule 204 ( c ) , such showing will be ex- amined by an Examiner of Interferences . If the Ex- aminer considers that the facts set out in the showing provide sufficient basis for the interference to proceed , the ...
36. lappuse
... showing in excuse of their omission from the original showing . If the applicant files a response to the order to show cause , the patentee will be furnished with one copy of the showing under Rule 204 ( c ) and will be allowed not less ...
... showing in excuse of their omission from the original showing . If the applicant files a response to the order to show cause , the patentee will be furnished with one copy of the showing under Rule 204 ( c ) and will be allowed not less ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting estoppel F 2d F.Supp ference infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer Terminal Disclaimer tion unpatentable ССРА