No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 16.
104. lappuse
The description of the structure in this respect contains no mention of resilience in respect to the arrangement or operation of the clamping means or clips . · There is no intimation or suggestion that the clips are adjustable so as to ...
The description of the structure in this respect contains no mention of resilience in respect to the arrangement or operation of the clamping means or clips . · There is no intimation or suggestion that the clips are adjustable so as to ...
108. lappuse
The specification of the Junior Party differs materially in this respect from the specification of the Senior Party which expressly describes such operation and function ( p . 2 , 7th line from bottom ; p .
The specification of the Junior Party differs materially in this respect from the specification of the Senior Party which expressly describes such operation and function ( p . 2 , 7th line from bottom ; p .
111. lappuse
The inclusion in proposed Count E of the definition of the panels as maintaining said cross beams in parallel relation with respect to each other renders the claim misdescriptive . The cross beams , which are described as parallel ...
The inclusion in proposed Count E of the definition of the panels as maintaining said cross beams in parallel relation with respect to each other renders the claim misdescriptive . The cross beams , which are described as parallel ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
52 CCPA abandonment action affidavits amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ