No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 18.
104. lappuse
The only reference in the application of Junior Party to telescoping of the panels is in relation to the setting up of the mine stopping ( spec . p . 6 , 6th line from bottom ) . Any telescoping of the panels as a result of distortion ...
The only reference in the application of Junior Party to telescoping of the panels is in relation to the setting up of the mine stopping ( spec . p . 6 , 6th line from bottom ) . Any telescoping of the panels as a result of distortion ...
107. lappuse
Proposed Count E generally follows proposed Count C but is more limited in defining the support bars as generally horizontal and arranged in spaced relation with one another and defines the adjustable means in somewhat different ...
Proposed Count E generally follows proposed Count C but is more limited in defining the support bars as generally horizontal and arranged in spaced relation with one another and defines the adjustable means in somewhat different ...
112. lappuse
necessarily maintained in parallel relation with respect to each other . The obvious purpose of the cross beams is to support the panels which form the stopping and to maintain them in arranged relation .
necessarily maintained in parallel relation with respect to each other . The obvious purpose of the cross beams is to support the panels which form the stopping and to maintain them in arranged relation .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA abandonment action amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC cause claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ