No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 17.
61. lappuse
Rule 2511 reads : ( a ) Times will be assigned in which the junior party shall complete his testimony in chief , and in which the other party shall complete the testimony on his side , and a further time in which the junior party may ...
Rule 2511 reads : ( a ) Times will be assigned in which the junior party shall complete his testimony in chief , and in which the other party shall complete the testimony on his side , and a further time in which the junior party may ...
109. lappuse
... of the panels as a result of distortion of the mine bottom from a squeeze , according to that description , would be accidental . Proposed Count B ( ...... Claim 9 , as amended ) reads : ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim ...
... of the panels as a result of distortion of the mine bottom from a squeeze , according to that description , would be accidental . Proposed Count B ( ...... Claim 9 , as amended ) reads : ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim ...
115. lappuse
The Interference Counts Count 1 , which derives from claim 1 of Patent No. reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) Count 2 , which derives from claim 2 of the said patent , reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) It is apparent that ...
The Interference Counts Count 1 , which derives from claim 1 of Patent No. reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) Count 2 , which derives from claim 2 of the said patent , reads as follows : ( here recite counts ) It is apparent that ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
52 CCPA abandonment action affidavits amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ