No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 16.
107. lappuse
3 are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed to define the invention of Count 4 somewhat more broadly , eliminating the overlapping feature and being directed to the structure independently of ...
3 are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed to define the invention of Count 4 somewhat more broadly , eliminating the overlapping feature and being directed to the structure independently of ...
109. lappuse
Claim 9 , as amended ) reads : ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim more specifically defines the clamping means and omits the whereby or functional clause of proposed . Count A. It includes , however , the same general ...
Claim 9 , as amended ) reads : ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim more specifically defines the clamping means and omits the whereby or functional clause of proposed . Count A. It includes , however , the same general ...
111. lappuse
The final phrase and elements of proposed Count D , namely , means sealing the joints between said panels and said stop ( p ) ing to said passageway , ܙܙ ܂ defines nothing but a common and well - known expedient long used in mine ...
The final phrase and elements of proposed Count D , namely , means sealing the joints between said panels and said stop ( p ) ing to said passageway , ܙܙ ܂ defines nothing but a common and well - known expedient long used in mine ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA abandonment action amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC cause claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ