No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 35.
6. lappuse
3 Claims ; Suggestion by Primary Examiner ; Effect Usually , in the case of pending applications , one is filed without knowledge of another , and so the claims of the rival applicants are not identical though readable upon the ...
3 Claims ; Suggestion by Primary Examiner ; Effect Usually , in the case of pending applications , one is filed without knowledge of another , and so the claims of the rival applicants are not identical though readable upon the ...
23. lappuse
Post - declaration referral of an interference to the primary examiner occurs in cases of ( 1 ) a motion by a party to amend or dissolve the interference , or relating to the benefit of an earlier application , or to declare another ...
Post - declaration referral of an interference to the primary examiner occurs in cases of ( 1 ) a motion by a party to amend or dissolve the interference , or relating to the benefit of an earlier application , or to declare another ...
24. lappuse
The interference will be continued or dissolved in accordance with the determination by the primary examiner . If such reference or reason be found while the interference is before the primary examiner for determination of a motion ...
The interference will be continued or dissolved in accordance with the determination by the primary examiner . If such reference or reason be found while the interference is before the primary examiner for determination of a motion ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA abandonment action amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC cause claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ