No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 24.
35. lappuse
Any response made during the specified period will be considered by a Board of Patent Interferences without an oral hearing unless such hearing is requested by 1 See text and footnote pp . 40-50 , infra ; also Rule 223 ( a ) .
Any response made during the specified period will be considered by a Board of Patent Interferences without an oral hearing unless such hearing is requested by 1 See text and footnote pp . 40-50 , infra ; also Rule 223 ( a ) .
40. lappuse
Motions ; Period for Making ; Types Motions are treated according to their subject matter under Rule 2311 or Rule 243.2 Motions governed by Rule 231 ( a ) are considered by the primary examiner . These must be filed within the period ...
Motions ; Period for Making ; Types Motions are treated according to their subject matter under Rule 2311 or Rule 243.2 Motions governed by Rule 231 ( a ) are considered by the primary examiner . These must be filed within the period ...
41. lappuse
Argument in opposition to such a motion must be filed within twenty days of the expiration of the motion period . ? Ordinarily there is no oral argument , nor reconsideration . The motion period is provided to enable the parties ...
Argument in opposition to such a motion must be filed within twenty days of the expiration of the motion period . ? Ordinarily there is no oral argument , nor reconsideration . The motion period is provided to enable the parties ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
52 CCPA abandonment action affidavits amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ