Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1971 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 24.
35. lappuse
... period specified in the notice , not less than thirty days , unless cause be shown why such action should not be taken . Any response made during the specified period will be considered by a Board of Patent Interferences without an oral ...
... period specified in the notice , not less than thirty days , unless cause be shown why such action should not be taken . Any response made during the specified period will be considered by a Board of Patent Interferences without an oral ...
40. lappuse
Motions ; Period for Making ; Types Motions are treated according to their subject matter under Rule 2311 or Rule 243.2 Motions governed by Rule 231 ( a ) are considered by the primary examiner . These must be filed within the period ...
Motions ; Period for Making ; Types Motions are treated according to their subject matter under Rule 2311 or Rule 243.2 Motions governed by Rule 231 ( a ) are considered by the primary examiner . These must be filed within the period ...
41. lappuse
... period.2 Ordinarily there is no oral argument , nor reconsid- eration.3 The motion period is provided to enable the parties to investigate , consider , and file motions to determine , before the taking of testimony , such questions as ...
... period.2 Ordinarily there is no oral argument , nor reconsid- eration.3 The motion period is provided to enable the parties to investigate , consider , and file motions to determine , before the taking of testimony , such questions as ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting estoppel F 2d F.Supp ference infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer Terminal Disclaimer tion unpatentable ССРА