Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1971 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 15.
40. lappuse
Motions ; Period for Making ; Types Motions are treated according to their subject matter under Rule 2311 or Rule 243.2 Motions governed by Rule 231 ( a ) are considered by the primary examiner . These must be filed within the period ...
Motions ; Period for Making ; Types Motions are treated according to their subject matter under Rule 2311 or Rule 243.2 Motions governed by Rule 231 ( a ) are considered by the primary examiner . These must be filed within the period ...
41. lappuse
... motion must be accompanied by proof of such service . ( 4 ) To be accorded the benefit of an earlier appli- cation or to attack the benefit of an earlier applica- tion which has ... motion period the parties and especially those other 41.
... motion must be accompanied by proof of such service . ( 4 ) To be accorded the benefit of an earlier appli- cation or to attack the benefit of an earlier applica- tion which has ... motion period the parties and especially those other 41.
42. lappuse
... motion ; else by motion and compliance with Rules 245 , 247 , 248 . It is highly important that proper steps be taken during the motion period , especially in the case of a junior party . Such a motion , under Rules 225 and 258 , for ...
... motion ; else by motion and compliance with Rules 245 , 247 , 248 . It is highly important that proper steps be taken during the motion period , especially in the case of a junior party . Such a motion , under Rules 225 and 258 , for ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting estoppel F 2d F.Supp ference infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer Terminal Disclaimer tion unpatentable ССРА