Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1971 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 20.
109. lappuse
... means and omits the " whereby " or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however , the same general definition of clamping means , namely , " means resiliently clampingly securing said panels to said support bar " , etc ...
... means and omits the " whereby " or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however , the same general definition of clamping means , namely , " means resiliently clampingly securing said panels to said support bar " , etc ...
125. lappuse
... means responding to the definition of the interference counts in respect to the centrifugal clutch K thereof , because operation of the said pedal does not effect the operation attributed to said means , but merely enables the operation ...
... means responding to the definition of the interference counts in respect to the centrifugal clutch K thereof , because operation of the said pedal does not effect the operation attributed to said means , but merely enables the operation ...
xxviii. lappuse
... ... .. 43 a priori .................................................................... -- 63 automatically controlled means ............................ .. 18 clearance ...................................................................
... ... .. 43 a priori .................................................................... -- 63 automatically controlled means ............................ .. 18 clearance ...................................................................
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting estoppel F 2d F.Supp ference infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer Terminal Disclaimer tion unpatentable ССРА