No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 19.
109. lappuse
resilience in respect to the arrangement or operation of the clamping means or clips . There is no intimation or suggestion that the clips are to be adjusted or tensioned so as to allow for telescoping of the channels or panels under ...
resilience in respect to the arrangement or operation of the clamping means or clips . There is no intimation or suggestion that the clips are to be adjusted or tensioned so as to allow for telescoping of the channels or panels under ...
125. lappuse
That the Board erred in failing to find that the speed responsive switch and the centrifugal clutch of the application of the said senior party and designated as automatically controlled means within the definition of the interference ...
That the Board erred in failing to find that the speed responsive switch and the centrifugal clutch of the application of the said senior party and designated as automatically controlled means within the definition of the interference ...
xxviii. lappuse
63 automatically controlled means ............................ .. 18 clearance .................................................................... .. 7 closely spaced ............................................................ -- 18 ...
63 automatically controlled means ............................ .. 18 clearance .................................................................... .. 7 closely spaced ............................................................ -- 18 ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA abandonment action amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC cause claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ