Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1971 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 10.
18. lappuse
... interpreted as including all elements contributing to such performance regardless of number or kind . But this doctrine does not permit a " double reading " of a single element of the disclosure.3 222 ( Bd . Pat . Int . 1965 ) , ...
... interpreted as including all elements contributing to such performance regardless of number or kind . But this doctrine does not permit a " double reading " of a single element of the disclosure.3 222 ( Bd . Pat . Int . 1965 ) , ...
19. lappuse
A count if ambiguous , will be interpreted in the light of the application in which it originated.1 A count will not be interpreted so broadly as to depart from the construction which was given it when it was allowed over the prior art ...
A count if ambiguous , will be interpreted in the light of the application in which it originated.1 A count will not be interpreted so broadly as to depart from the construction which was given it when it was allowed over the prior art ...
92. lappuse
... interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read on a prior art patent . The court while recognizing the rule that interference counts generally are to be ...
... interpreted to mean movement longitudinally of the axis of the car , as contended by the adverse party , the count would read on a prior art patent . The court while recognizing the rule that interference counts generally are to be ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting estoppel F 2d F.Supp ference infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer Terminal Disclaimer tion unpatentable ССРА