No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 18.
108. lappuse
The specification of the Junior Party differs materially in this respect from the specification of the Senior Party which expressly describes such operation and function ( p . 2 , 7th line from bottom ; p .
The specification of the Junior Party differs materially in this respect from the specification of the Senior Party which expressly describes such operation and function ( p . 2 , 7th line from bottom ; p .
109. lappuse
2 , 4th paragraph ; Claims 4 , 9 ) where it is clearly declared that the panels shall function to maintain the cross beams in position ... a condition incompatible with the resiliently clamping and functional requirements of the claim .
2 , 4th paragraph ; Claims 4 , 9 ) where it is clearly declared that the panels shall function to maintain the cross beams in position ... a condition incompatible with the resiliently clamping and functional requirements of the claim .
125. lappuse
... controlled means within the definition of the interference counts are independent of each other and perform distinct functions and do not cooperate to perform the function , or operation , defined in the interference counts . 14 .
... controlled means within the definition of the interference counts are independent of each other and perform distinct functions and do not cooperate to perform the function , or operation , defined in the interference counts . 14 .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA abandonment action amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC cause claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation inventor involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ