Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1971 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 5.
29. lappuse
... failing to serve a copy of his preliminary statement as required to his filing date , citing Rule 223 ( c ) , which imposes a similar restriction for failure to file . Rule 224 restricts reliance on a prior application for the benefit ...
... failing to serve a copy of his preliminary statement as required to his filing date , citing Rule 223 ( c ) , which imposes a similar restriction for failure to file . Rule 224 restricts reliance on a prior application for the benefit ...
124. lappuse
... failing to find that the structure disclosed in the application of the said senior party is in- operative to perform the function stated in the counts of the said interference , and each of them . 7. The Board erred in failing to find ...
... failing to find that the structure disclosed in the application of the said senior party is in- operative to perform the function stated in the counts of the said interference , and each of them . 7. The Board erred in failing to find ...
125. lappuse
... failing to find that the accelera- tor pedal disclosed in the application of the said senior party , and its associated parts , do not constitute manually operated overcontrol means responding to the definition of the interference ...
... failing to find that the accelera- tor pedal disclosed in the application of the said senior party , and its associated parts , do not constitute manually operated overcontrol means responding to the definition of the interference ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting estoppel F 2d F.Supp ference infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer Terminal Disclaimer tion unpatentable ССРА