Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1971 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 56.
115. lappuse
... disclosed in the application of and tion stated in the count . is inoperative to perform the func- ( 3 ) The disclosure of the application of and --9 is radically different from the disclosure of the patent to the structures of the two ...
... disclosed in the application of and tion stated in the count . is inoperative to perform the func- ( 3 ) The disclosure of the application of and --9 is radically different from the disclosure of the patent to the structures of the two ...
124. lappuse
... disclosure of the application of the said senior party is radically different from the disclosure of the patent to the junior party , that the structure of the said two disclosures are designed to operate and actually operate to perform ...
... disclosure of the application of the said senior party is radically different from the disclosure of the patent to the junior party , that the structure of the said two disclosures are designed to operate and actually operate to perform ...
xxviii. lappuse
... ............ -. 36 abandoned experiment .................................. ..72, 73,75 adequacy of disclosure .......................................... .. 13 ambiguity .....................................................
... ............ -. 36 abandoned experiment .................................. ..72, 73,75 adequacy of disclosure .......................................... .. 13 ambiguity .....................................................
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 75 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Interference Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Company Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure double patenting estoppel F 2d F.Supp ference infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior party jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter Supp supra Switzer Terminal Disclaimer tion unpatentable ССРА