No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 33.
24. lappuse
The interference will be continued or dissolved in accordance with the determination by the primary examiner . If such reference or reason be found while the interference is before the primary examiner for determination of a motion ...
The interference will be continued or dissolved in accordance with the determination by the primary examiner . If such reference or reason be found while the interference is before the primary examiner for determination of a motion ...
82. lappuse
1935 ) . See p . 59 , supra , and text and notes , pp . 88-90 , infra . Cf. Hession , cit . p . 12 , supra , re finality of election as determination of priority ; Commissioner's Decision , October 10 , 1968 , 161 USPQ 768 .
1935 ) . See p . 59 , supra , and text and notes , pp . 88-90 , infra . Cf. Hession , cit . p . 12 , supra , re finality of election as determination of priority ; Commissioner's Decision , October 10 , 1968 , 161 USPQ 768 .
87. lappuse
A case may be remanded for determination by the Board of an essential fact not found in the appealed decision . Miller v . House , 353 F.2d 252 ( CCPA 1965 ) . The Board may be required to take all necessary and appropriate action .
A case may be remanded for determination by the Board of an essential fact not found in the appealed decision . Miller v . House , 353 F.2d 252 ( CCPA 1965 ) . The Board may be required to take all necessary and appropriate action .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | iii |
Introduction | lvi |
The principal steps in an interference proceeding | 4 |
Autortiesības | |
4 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
52 CCPA abandonment action affidavits amendment appeal application assignee Attorneys award Board Brenner burden CADC claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation Court Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination direct disclosure dissolve distinguished effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing date final hearing ground held infra inter interference interpretation involving JPOS judgment Junior jurisdiction limitations Manual means motion notice old Rule operation original panels Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner prior priority of invention procedure proceedings proof proposed Count Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relation Request requisites res adjudicata respect senior party specification steps subject matter Supp supra taking Term testimony tion United USPQ