Campaign Finance Reform: Proposals Impacting Broadcasters, Cable Operators, and Satellite Providers : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, First Session, June 20, 2001, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 2001 - 76 lappuses |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
adver Alliance for Better Belo BELO CORPORATION Better Campaigns BEVIER bill broadcast industry C-SPAN cable industry cable operators Cablevision campaign finance reform candidates and national Chairman Challenger charge law committee Congress Congressional cost of campaigns cost of political Court coverage current law Democratic didates District DWIGHT L election cycle expensive fairness doctrine federal candidates Fox News Channel going House Incumbent issue Jon Corzine KYW-TV LARGENT look lowest unit charge LUC law MARKEY ment million MORRIS national political parties networks non-preemptable Norman Lear Center Open-Seat paign Paul Taylor percent political ads political advertising political campaigns political candidates preemptible programming proposal purchase question races radio advertising reasonable access Red Lion reelection regulation SANDER Sapan satellite providers Senate spectrum spent Taylor television and radio television stations Thank there's tion Torricelli Amendment Troy Brown UPTON viewers vote voters
Populāri fragmenti
31. lappuse - The constitutional right of free expression is powerful medicine in a society as diverse and populous as ours. It is designed and intended to remove governmental restraints from the arena of public discussion, putting the decision as to what views shall be voiced largely into the hands of each of us, in the hope that use of such freedom will ultimately produce a more capable citizenry and more perfect polity and in the belief that no other approach would comport with the premise of individual dignity...
32. lappuse - The First Amendment denies government the power to determine that spending to promote one's political views is wasteful, excessive, or unwise. In the free society ordained by our Constitution it is not the government, but the people — individually as citizens and candidates and collectively as associations and political committees — who must retain control over the quantity and range of debate on public issues in a political campaign.
30. lappuse - When the Government defends a regulation on speech as a means to redress past harms or prevent anticipated harms, it must do more than simply "posit the existence of the disease sought to be cured.
32. lappuse - It is the right of the viewers and listeners, not the right of the broadcasters, which is paramount.
25. lappuse - It is the right of the public to receive suitable access to social, political, esthetic, moral, and other ideas and experiences which is crucial here. That right may not constitutionally be abridged either by Congress or by the FCC.
25. lappuse - There is nothing in the First Amendment which prevents the Government from requiring a licensee to share his frequency with others and to conduct himself as a proxy or fiduciary with obligations to present those views and voices which are representative of his community and which would otherwise, by necessity, be barred from the airwaves.
26. lappuse - Code; or (7) for willful or repeated failure to allow reasonable access to or to permit purchase of reasonable amounts of time for the use of a broadcasting station, other than a non-commercial educational broadcast station, by a legally qualified candidate for Federal elective office on behalf of his candidacy.
26. lappuse - During the forty-five days preceding the date of a primary or primary runoff election and during the sixty days preceding the date of a general or special election in which such person is a candidate, the lowest unit charge of the station for the same class and amount of time for the same period ; and (2) At any other time, the charges made for comparable use of such station by other users thereof.
28. lappuse - Die" to hundreds of people each day. The fact that most individuals agree with the thrust of New Hampshire's motto is not the test; most Americans also find the flag salute acceptable. The First Amendment protects the right of individuals to hold a point of view different from the majority and to refuse to foster, in the way New Hampshire commands, an idea they find morally objectionable.
29. lappuse - In responding to access requests, however, broadcasters may also give weight to such factors as the amount of time previously sold to the candidate, the disruptive impact on regular programming, and the likelihood of requests for time by rival candidates under the equal opportunities provision of § 315(a).