Railroad Retirement Annuity Increase--1972: Hearing, Ninety-second Congress, Second Session, on S. 3852 ... H.R. 15922 ... [and] H.R. 15927 ... August 10, 1972, 11-12. sējumiU.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 - 181 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 16.
30. lappuse
... actuarial deficiency . The railroad retirement fund is maintained solely by tax contribu- tions in equal shares from railroad employers and employees . The present tax rate for railroad retirement is 9.95 percent , with an earn- ings ...
... actuarial deficiency . The railroad retirement fund is maintained solely by tax contribu- tions in equal shares from railroad employers and employees . The present tax rate for railroad retirement is 9.95 percent , with an earn- ings ...
31. lappuse
... actuarial deficiency , threatening the solvency of the railroad retirement system should be delayed until an adequate and acceptable method of financ- ing the cost of the increase is developed . In 1970 railroad retirement benefits were ...
... actuarial deficiency , threatening the solvency of the railroad retirement system should be delayed until an adequate and acceptable method of financ- ing the cost of the increase is developed . In 1970 railroad retirement benefits were ...
33. lappuse
... actuarial deficiency threatening the solvency of the railroad retirement system should be delayed until an adequate and acceptable method is developed for financing the cost of the increase . In 1970 , benefits under the Railroad ...
... actuarial deficiency threatening the solvency of the railroad retirement system should be delayed until an adequate and acceptable method is developed for financing the cost of the increase . In 1970 , benefits under the Railroad ...
34. lappuse
... actuarial soundness of the system . Another benefit increase , especially an increase as substantial as that proposed by S. 3852 , would , of course , compound the actuarial deficiency already existing , particularly since once again no ...
... actuarial soundness of the system . Another benefit increase , especially an increase as substantial as that proposed by S. 3852 , would , of course , compound the actuarial deficiency already existing , particularly since once again no ...
35. lappuse
... deficit would be $ 129 million per year on a level basis , or 2.18 per cent of future taxable payroll . Thus , under either circumstance , the retirement -4-5 system would have a serious actuarial deficiency and would 35.
... deficit would be $ 129 million per year on a level basis , or 2.18 per cent of future taxable payroll . Thus , under either circumstance , the retirement -4-5 system would have a serious actuarial deficiency and would 35.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
20 percent 20-percent increase actuarial deficiency adjustments amount benefit increase benefit levels bill billion cent increase Chairman changes clause Commission on Railroad Commission's report computed Congress covered payroll deficit dual benefits earnings effect enacted financial interchange financing formula fund future income increase in benefits June 30 Leighty majority ment month OASDI benefits paid percent increase percentage present President problems projections proposed Public Law rail railroad beneficiaries railroad benefits railroad employees railroad employment railroad industry Railroad Retirement Account Railroad Retirement Act railroad retirement beneficiaries railroad retirement benefits Railroad Retirement Board railroad retirement system railroad workers railway labor Railway Labor Executives ratio recommendations regular annuity restructured road retirement second tier Senator CRANSTON Social Security Act Social Security Administration social security benefits social security system special annuity SPEIRS staff pension staff tier SUBCOMMITTEE ON RAILROAD survivors tax rate temporary tion tirement wage base YNTEMA