2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. Apple Computer Inc. v. Formula International, Inc., 725 Same as 1. F. Supp. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Formula International, Inc., Hubco Data Products Corp. v. Management Assistance, Inc., GCA Corp. v. Chance, 217 U.S.P.Q. 718 (N.D. Cal. 1982). Freedman v. Select Information Systems, 221 U.S.P.Q. 848 Prima facie effect of registration supports preliminary Tandy Corp. v. Personal Micro Computers, 524 F. Supp. 171 ROM as an infringing "copy." American Intelligent Machines Corp. v. Basic Computers, Inc., Consent judgment prohibiting reproduction, distribution Williams Electronics, Inc. v. Artic International, 685 F. 2d Chip duplication as "copy" within definitional provisions. Midway Mfg. Co. v. Artic International, 704 F. 2d 1009 Infringement of audiovisual display and underlying computer Peachtree Software Inc. v. United Computer Corp., C-83-2082A (N.D. Ga.). Complaint filed 1983. Suit to enjoin rental of licensed software. MicroPro International Corp. v. United Computer Corp., C-833019 (N.D. Cal.). Complaint filed June 17, 1983. Dismissed per settlement. Same as 12. Atari, Inc. v. JS&A Group, Inc., CCH Copr. L. Rep. applicable In Re Certain Personal Computers & Components Thereof, U.S.I.T.C. S&H Computer Systems, Inc. v. SAS Institute Inc., 568 F. Program produced under partial government funding in Videotronics, Inc. v. Bend Electronics, 586 F. Supp. 1471 Micro-Sparc., Inc. v. Amtype Corp., Civ. No. 84-1043-G (D. Mass. ELECTRONIC DATA BASES 29-909 084- 17 See Rand McNally & Co. v. Fleet Mgt. Systems, Inc., CCH Copr. L. Rep. 125,692 (N.D. Ill. July 25, 1984). Computer input of conventional work infringement. Cf. also following compilation cases: Eckes v. Card Prices Update, 736 F. 2d 859 (2d Cir. 1984). Compilation of baseball cards protectible based on subjective selectivity involved. Rockford Map Publishers, Inc. v. Directory Service Co. of Colorado, Inc., 83-2523 (C.D. Ill. June 14, 1984). Compilation of landowner information. "Industriousness" standard of protection and infringement. Hutchinson Tel. Co. v. Fronteer Directory Co. of Minnesota, Inc., 586 F. Supp. 911 (D. Minn. 1984), appeal filed. White pages of telephone directory held not an original work of authorship since publication required by state law. Financial Information, Inc. v. Moody's Investors Service, Compilation of daily bond cards; fair use. Dow Jones & Co. v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 546 Compilation of stock market indexes. National Business Lists, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., "Fact" protection in compilation cases may lack "conceptual Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Associated Telephone Directory Publishers, CCH Copr. L. Rep. 125,573 Originality of telephone directory. VIDEO GAMES 1. 2. 3. Midway Mfg. Co. v. Artic International, 704 F. 2d 1009 Infringement of audiovisual display; fixation requirement Williams Electronics, Inc. v. Artic International, 685 F. Infringement of audiovisual display and underlying computer program. Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Corp., 672 F. 2d 607 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. den. 10/4/82. Infringement of audiovisual display. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Stern Electronics v. Kaufman, 669 F. 2d 852 (2d Cir. 1982). Midway Mfg. Co. v. Strohon, 564 F. Supp. 741 (N.D. Ill. 1983). Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc., 564 F. Supp. 125 Same as 3. Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Bay Coin Distributors, Inc., Atari, Inc. v. Armenia Ltd., CCH Copr. L. Rep. 125,328 Same as 3. Midway Mfg. Co. v. Dirkschneider, 543 F. Supp. 466 and 215 Cinematronics v. Noma Enterprises Co. CIV. 81-349 PHX- Same as 3. Atari, Inc. v. Williams, 217 U.S.P.Q. 746 (E.D. Cal. 1981). Atari, Inc. v. Amusement World, 547 F. Supp. 222 (D. Md. 1981). Appeal withdrawn per settlement. Same as 11. In Re Certain Coin Operated Audiovisual Games, USITC No. 337- 216 U.S.P.Q. 1106, 218 U.S.P.Q. 924 (1982) and Bally/ Bally/Midway Mfg. Co. v. American Postage Machines, Inc., Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Elcon Industries, Inc., Same as 3; unauthorized publication without notice did Infringement Videotronics, Inc. v. Bend Electronics, 586 F. Supp. 478 V. VI. 17. Kramer v. Andrews, 83-1344-3 (D. So. Car. May 29, 1984), appeal filed. De minimis authorship; insufficient notice; insufficient effort to cure omission of notice. SECONDARY TRANSMISSION BY CABLE TELEVISION OPERATORS 1. 2. 3. American International Productions v. Arlington Tele- Complaint withdrawn Cablevision Systems Development Co. v. MPAA, CIV. No. 83-1655 June 8, 1983; counterclaim for infringement filed June 17, 1983 NCTA v. Columbia Pictures, Inc., CIV. No. 83-2785 (D.D.C.). Cf. Orth-O-Vision, Inc. v. Home Box Office, 474 F. Supp. 672 Unauthorized retransmission of programs constituted an SECONDARY TRANSMISSION BY CARRIERS 1. 2. WGN Continental Broadcasting Co. v. United Video, Inc., Eastern Microwave, Inc. v. Doubleday Sports, Inc., 691 F. 1. 2. Manhattan Cable Television Inc. v. Brandes, 83 CIV. No. Manhattan Cable Television Inc. v. Swells Restaurant, 83 CIV. No. 6271 (S.D.N.Y.). Complaint filed August 23, 1983. (Same as 1., except filed against two restaurants.) |