The Law of Chemical, Metallurgical and Pharmaceutical PatentsHoward I. Forman Central Book Company, 1967 - 863 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 81.
421. lappuse
... reason of a defective specification or drawing , ' particularly specifying such defects . " ( 3 ) When it is claimed that such patent is inoperative or invalid ' by reason of the patentee claiming more or less than he had a right to ...
... reason of a defective specification or drawing , ' particularly specifying such defects . " ( 3 ) When it is claimed that such patent is inoperative or invalid ' by reason of the patentee claiming more or less than he had a right to ...
425. lappuse
... reason for refusing Markush claims of varying scope ? Mr. Stone : Actually , the only reason we have is that the Patent Office feels that some attorneys are not reasonable in their presenta- tion of the number of Markush claims . When ...
... reason for refusing Markush claims of varying scope ? Mr. Stone : Actually , the only reason we have is that the Patent Office feels that some attorneys are not reasonable in their presenta- tion of the number of Markush claims . When ...
446. lappuse
... reason , 35 U.S. C. 121 applies and the rejection of double patenting cannot be made by the Examiner . Mr. Freedman : A joint application filed for applicants A and B is rejected by the Examiner as being unpatentable over A's copend ...
... reason , 35 U.S. C. 121 applies and the rejection of double patenting cannot be made by the Examiner . Mr. Freedman : A joint application filed for applicants A and B is rejected by the Examiner as being unpatentable over A's copend ...
Saturs
Chapter | 1 |
By CHARLES C PRICE | 15 |
By JOHN T CONNOR AND I LOUIS WOLK | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
15 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2nd Cir affidavit alloy assignment basis Board of Appeals chemical compound chemical patent chromium claims Company considered Corp court held Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision diligence disclosed discovery discussed doctrine of equivalents double patenting drug effect estoppel Examiner example fact filing date granted industry infringement ingredients interference interference proceedings invalid inventor inventorship involved issue license licensor limited machine manufacture Markush material ment method motion obtain obvious party Patent Act Patent Appeals patent application Patent Attorney Patent Examining patent law Patent Office patent system patented invention pharmaceutical present printed publication prior art priority problem proof properties question reason reduction to practice reference reissue rejection result royalty Rule Section 103 situation skilled SOC'Y specification statement statute statutory steel subject matter supra thing tion U.S. Patent United unobvious vention