The Law of Chemical, Metallurgical and Pharmaceutical PatentsHoward I. Forman Central Book Company, 1967 - 863 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 81.
235. lappuse
... problem after this recognition by reducing the stress concentrations in the tread by including a plurality of plies of reinforcing cord . The C.C.P.A. stated : “ * * * The obvious problem was simply the failure of tires on airplanes ...
... problem after this recognition by reducing the stress concentrations in the tread by including a plurality of plies of reinforcing cord . The C.C.P.A. stated : “ * * * The obvious problem was simply the failure of tires on airplanes ...
236. lappuse
... problem of porosity was caused by gaseous nitrogen given off when aluminum nitrides or carbonitrides were heated during weld- ing of such steels . The porosity problem was associated with welding the stainless steel and did not ...
... problem of porosity was caused by gaseous nitrogen given off when aluminum nitrides or carbonitrides were heated during weld- ing of such steels . The porosity problem was associated with welding the stainless steel and did not ...
384. lappuse
... problem to be cured has not been quantitatively set ? The two things , the concentration of treatment and the problem to be solved , are intimately associated and if one is to be set so should the other . Otherwise the limits of concen ...
... problem to be cured has not been quantitatively set ? The two things , the concentration of treatment and the problem to be solved , are intimately associated and if one is to be set so should the other . Otherwise the limits of concen ...
Saturs
Chapter | 1 |
By CHARLES C PRICE | 15 |
By JOHN T CONNOR AND I LOUIS WOLK | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
15 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2nd Cir affidavit alloy assignment basis Board of Appeals chemical compound chemical patent chromium claims Company considered Corp court held Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision diligence disclosed discovery discussed doctrine of equivalents double patenting drug effect estoppel Examiner example fact filing date granted industry infringement ingredients interference interference proceedings invalid inventor inventorship involved issue license licensor limited machine manufacture Markush material ment method motion obtain obvious party Patent Act Patent Appeals patent application Patent Attorney Patent Examining patent law Patent Office patent system patented invention pharmaceutical present printed publication prior art priority problem proof properties question reason reduction to practice reference reissue rejection result royalty Rule Section 103 situation skilled SOC'Y specification statement statute statutory steel subject matter supra thing tion U.S. Patent United unobvious vention