The Law of Chemical, Metallurgical and Pharmaceutical PatentsHoward I. Forman Central Book Company, 1967 - 863 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 83.
367. lappuse
... means whereby , " " means adapted to , " " in proportion to , " " parts so arranged that , " " means for , " " product capable of , " and " compositions having the properties of . " 68 Claims have also been characterized as functional ...
... means whereby , " " means adapted to , " " in proportion to , " " parts so arranged that , " " means for , " " product capable of , " and " compositions having the properties of . " 68 Claims have also been characterized as functional ...
369. lappuse
... MEANS CLAIMS Single means claims are prohibited . In other words , a claim re- citing only one means will be rejected as encompassing all possible means for performing a desired function . " 72. Georgia Pacific Corp. v . United States ...
... MEANS CLAIMS Single means claims are prohibited . In other words , a claim re- citing only one means will be rejected as encompassing all possible means for performing a desired function . " 72. Georgia Pacific Corp. v . United States ...
381. lappuse
... means claims be used in chem- ical composition ? That is , means for dispersing , or to call for a dis- persing agent . Dr. Herr : I think means claims can be used to some extent in chemical compositions , although much less than in the ...
... means claims be used in chem- ical composition ? That is , means for dispersing , or to call for a dis- persing agent . Dr. Herr : I think means claims can be used to some extent in chemical compositions , although much less than in the ...
Saturs
Chapter | 1 |
By CHARLES C PRICE | 15 |
By JOHN T CONNOR AND I LOUIS WOLK | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
15 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2nd Cir affidavit alloy assignment basis Board of Appeals chemical compound chemical patent chromium claims Company considered Corp court held Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision diligence disclosed discovery discussed doctrine of equivalents double patenting drug effect estoppel Examiner example fact filing date granted industry infringement ingredients interference interference proceedings invalid inventor inventorship involved issue license licensor limited machine manufacture Markush material ment method motion obtain obvious party Patent Act Patent Appeals patent application Patent Attorney Patent Examining patent law Patent Office patent system patented invention pharmaceutical present printed publication prior art priority problem proof properties question reason reduction to practice reference reissue rejection result royalty Rule Section 103 situation skilled SOC'Y specification statement statute statutory steel subject matter supra thing tion U.S. Patent United unobvious vention