The Law of Chemical, Metallurgical and Pharmaceutical PatentsHoward I. Forman Central Book Company, 1967 - 863 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 82.
305. lappuse
... examples are sometimes stated in detail like working examples , but sometimes they are listed in tables of ingredients which can be used instead of a cer- tain ingredient in a working example . " 1 The Patent Office and the Courts have ...
... examples are sometimes stated in detail like working examples , but sometimes they are listed in tables of ingredients which can be used instead of a cer- tain ingredient in a working example . " 1 The Patent Office and the Courts have ...
306. lappuse
... example of such a ring and eight examples of other compounds which were not piperidines but were related.99 In a claim relating to halogenated ketals , where the inventor disclosed several broad groups without examples in defining R ...
... example of such a ring and eight examples of other compounds which were not piperidines but were related.99 In a claim relating to halogenated ketals , where the inventor disclosed several broad groups without examples in defining R ...
325. lappuse
... examples and in other cases are included as tables . For example : " Table I shows components which can be used in Example 1 instead of reactant A and Table II shows components which can be used in Example 1 instead of reactant B. " 179 ...
... examples and in other cases are included as tables . For example : " Table I shows components which can be used in Example 1 instead of reactant A and Table II shows components which can be used in Example 1 instead of reactant B. " 179 ...
Saturs
Chapter | 1 |
By CHARLES C PRICE | 15 |
By JOHN T CONNOR AND I LOUIS WOLK | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
15 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2nd Cir affidavit alloy assignment basis Board of Appeals chemical compound chemical patent chromium claims Company considered Corp court held Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision diligence disclosed discovery discussed doctrine of equivalents double patenting drug effect estoppel Examiner example fact filing date granted industry infringement ingredients interference interference proceedings invalid inventor inventorship involved issue license licensor limited machine manufacture Markush material ment method motion obtain obvious party Patent Act Patent Appeals patent application Patent Attorney Patent Examining patent law Patent Office patent system patented invention pharmaceutical present printed publication prior art priority problem proof properties question reason reduction to practice reference reissue rejection result royalty Rule Section 103 situation skilled SOC'Y specification statement statute statutory steel subject matter supra thing tion U.S. Patent United unobvious vention