The Law of Chemical, Metallurgical and Pharmaceutical PatentsHoward I. Forman Central Book Company, 1967 - 863 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 75.
145. lappuse
... court below and the Court of Appeals held that this was enough to establish a public use . In this instance no money changed hands . There was lacking any commercial transaction . The coated tapes were not sold . The unused oxide was ...
... court below and the Court of Appeals held that this was enough to establish a public use . In this instance no money changed hands . There was lacking any commercial transaction . The coated tapes were not sold . The unused oxide was ...
246. lappuse
Howard I. Forman. the court , and one of the briefs amicus curiae , did not take this posi- tion . Other parties and a number of amicus briefs , however , did stress the argument . It was flatly rejected by the court , both in an- swer ...
Howard I. Forman. the court , and one of the briefs amicus curiae , did not take this posi- tion . Other parties and a number of amicus briefs , however , did stress the argument . It was flatly rejected by the court , both in an- swer ...
247. lappuse
... court acted contrary to two district courts and one court of appeals ruling . In Calmar v . Cook , the patent was directed to a hold down cap for an insecticide dispenser . There was evidence , and trial court find- ings , that the art ...
... court acted contrary to two district courts and one court of appeals ruling . In Calmar v . Cook , the patent was directed to a hold down cap for an insecticide dispenser . There was evidence , and trial court find- ings , that the art ...
Saturs
Chapter | 1 |
By CHARLES C PRICE | 15 |
By JOHN T CONNOR AND I LOUIS WOLK | 25 |
Autortiesības | |
15 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2nd Cir affidavit alloy assignment basis Board of Appeals chemical compound chemical patent chromium claims Company considered Corp court held Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision diligence disclosed discovery discussed doctrine of equivalents double patenting drug effect estoppel Examiner example fact filing date granted industry infringement ingredients interference interference proceedings invalid inventor inventorship involved issue license licensor limited machine manufacture Markush material ment method motion obtain obvious party Patent Act Patent Appeals patent application Patent Attorney Patent Examining patent law Patent Office patent system patented invention pharmaceutical present printed publication prior art priority problem proof properties question reason reduction to practice reference reissue rejection result royalty Rule Section 103 situation skilled SOC'Y specification statement statute statutory steel subject matter supra thing tion U.S. Patent United unobvious vention