H.R. 2385 and H.R. 2488: legislative hearing before the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation, and Public Lands of the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, first session, July 26, 2001, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 2002 - 67 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 19.
27. lappuse
... military needs on the nearby Utah Test and Training Range and Dugway Proving Ground . We are in complete agreement on the importance of the mission of these military bases . We would like to consider expanding 27.
... military needs on the nearby Utah Test and Training Range and Dugway Proving Ground . We are in complete agreement on the importance of the mission of these military bases . We would like to consider expanding 27.
28. lappuse
... military bases . We would like to consider expanding the scope of the proposed MOU to include all aspects of military use in the proposed Pilot Range Wilderness , including placement of and access to communications and tracking systems ...
... military bases . We would like to consider expanding the scope of the proposed MOU to include all aspects of military use in the proposed Pilot Range Wilderness , including placement of and access to communications and tracking systems ...
29. lappuse
... military needs on the nearby Utah Test and Training Range and Dugway Proving Ground . We are in complete agreement on the importance of the mission of these military bases . The language of section 2 ( f ) of this bill must ade- quately ...
... military needs on the nearby Utah Test and Training Range and Dugway Proving Ground . We are in complete agreement on the importance of the mission of these military bases . The language of section 2 ( f ) of this bill must ade- quately ...
30. lappuse
... military training and testing operations . It is my opinion that military range operations and wilderness areas can be compatible . In this bill , it is of particular note that low - level overflight will not be restricted . Also ...
... military training and testing operations . It is my opinion that military range operations and wilderness areas can be compatible . In this bill , it is of particular note that low - level overflight will not be restricted . Also ...
31. lappuse
... Military Operating Areas ( MOAS ) . The range supports train- ing customers with capabilities for air - to - ground , air - to - air , and ground force exer- cises . This includes testing and training for allied forces , other national ...
... Military Operating Areas ( MOAS ) . The range supports train- ing customers with capabilities for air - to - ground , air - to - air , and ground force exer- cises . This includes testing and training for allied forces , other national ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
Babbitt Bald Eagle Mountain Basin bench lands Bettridge Creek bighorn sheep boundaries Box Elder County CANNON Chairman Hansen checkerboard CHRISTENSEN City of St Colonel LARKIN Committee Congress critical Department of Defense derness Deseret Ranch Desert Protection Act Dilophosaurus dinosaur tracks discovery Donner feet FULTON future wilderness George going guage habitat HARJA HEFLEY Hill Air Force included Interior Lahontan cutthroat trout Larry Young legislation management language MCARTHUR million acres national parks ness Nevada opportunity overflights Pilot Peak Pilot Range Wilderness proposed wilderness public lands question recreational release language road sorties Southern Utah Wilderness species statement Subcommittee supports H.R. SUWA Test and Training testimony Thank thing trace fossils Training Range Utah Test Utah Wilderness Alliance Utah's UTTR Virgin River visitors water right West Desert Wilderness Act wilderness areas wilderness bills wilderness designation wilderness study areas wilderness units wildlife YOUNG