H.R. 2385 and H.R. 2488: legislative hearing before the Subcommittee on National Parks, Recreation, and Public Lands of the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, first session, July 26, 2001, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 2002 - 67 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 16.
22. lappuse
... boundaries and specific management language appropriate to the area , we can address the problem with a minimal amount of rhetoric . It is a labor - intensive and time - consuming process . But if it moves the debate forward , I am ...
... boundaries and specific management language appropriate to the area , we can address the problem with a minimal amount of rhetoric . It is a labor - intensive and time - consuming process . But if it moves the debate forward , I am ...
23. lappuse
... boundaries that we have drawn are minimal . We intentionally have drawn boundaries around two streams specifically because keeping these streams in the wilderness would impair the ability of the Division of Wildlife Resources in the BLM ...
... boundaries that we have drawn are minimal . We intentionally have drawn boundaries around two streams specifically because keeping these streams in the wilderness would impair the ability of the Division of Wildlife Resources in the BLM ...
24. lappuse
... boundaries that we have drawn are mini- mal . We intentionally have drawn boundaries around two streams specifically be- cause keeping these streams in the wilderness would impair the ability of the Divi- sion of Wildlife Resources and ...
... boundaries that we have drawn are mini- mal . We intentionally have drawn boundaries around two streams specifically be- cause keeping these streams in the wilderness would impair the ability of the Divi- sion of Wildlife Resources and ...
33. lappuse
... boundary of that wilderness and that that area of particular concern - I think it is an area of particular concern - would not be included in that area ? Mr. FULTON . Well , we would anticipate working with the author of the bill and ...
... boundary of that wilderness and that that area of particular concern - I think it is an area of particular concern - would not be included in that area ? Mr. FULTON . Well , we would anticipate working with the author of the bill and ...
36. lappuse
... Interior under the previous administration spent a fair amount of time out in this area . We looked at the mountain range ; we looked at the lands nearby . We looked at manageable boundaries ; we looked at who owns the land 36.
... Interior under the previous administration spent a fair amount of time out in this area . We looked at the mountain range ; we looked at the lands nearby . We looked at manageable boundaries ; we looked at who owns the land 36.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
Babbitt Bald Eagle Mountain Basin bench lands Bettridge Creek bighorn sheep boundaries Box Elder County CANNON Chairman Hansen checkerboard CHRISTENSEN City of St Colonel LARKIN Committee Congress critical Department of Defense derness Deseret Ranch Desert Protection Act Dilophosaurus dinosaur tracks discovery Donner feet FULTON future wilderness George going guage habitat HARJA HEFLEY Hill Air Force included Interior Lahontan cutthroat trout Larry Young legislation management language MCARTHUR million acres national parks ness Nevada opportunity overflights Pilot Peak Pilot Range Wilderness proposed wilderness public lands question recreational release language road sorties Southern Utah Wilderness species statement Subcommittee supports H.R. SUWA Test and Training testimony Thank thing trace fossils Training Range Utah Test Utah Wilderness Alliance Utah's UTTR Virgin River visitors water right West Desert Wilderness Act wilderness areas wilderness bills wilderness designation wilderness study areas wilderness units wildlife YOUNG