Opinion Per Curiam. of Ohio be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; for the reason that the question presented to the court is whether the order of the Commission was unjust and unreasonable and the solution of this question depended on the facts as disclosed by the record. The commission had the witnesses and the entire situation before them and an examination of the record does not disclose in the judgment of the court such a state of facts as would warrant the reversal of the order by the commission. Order affirmed. JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON, HOUGH and ROBINSON, JJ., concur. TOBEY, COMMITTEE, ETC., v. THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL. Public utilities commission—Order not unreasonable or unlawful - Abandonment of interurban railway service, etc. (No. 16783-Decided December 21, 1920.) ERROR to the Public Utilities Commission. Mr. O. P. Gothlin and Messrs. Johnson, Sharp & Schooler, for plaintiff in error. Mr. John G. Price, attorney general; Mr. E. E. Corn and Messrs. Corwin, Worman & Leach, for defendant in error. This court is of the opinion that the order of the public utilities commission, including its order per Opinion Per Curiam. mitting the abandonment by the railway company of its tracks between Roslyn and the Ryne Grocery corner in Beavertown, Ohio, is neither unreasonable nor unlawful; and this court finds from an examination of the record that the order so made by the public utilities commission was amply sustained by the evidence, having in view due regard for the welfare of the public and the cost of operating the service between the various points in controversy in said cause. It is therefore ordered and adjudged by this court that the order of the public utilities commission be, and the same is hereby affirmed. Order affirmed. NICHOLS, C. J., JONES, MATTHIAS, JOHNSON, HOUGH and WANAMAKER, JJ., concur. ROBINSON, J., not participating. INDEX ABANDONMENT- Interurban service, etc.— Public utilities commission - Order not Assessments - Highways—nterurban railroad-Right of way - ACCOMMODATION ENDORSER — Negotiable instruments - Notice to transferee - Partnership note ACCOMPLICES- Evidence - Testimony of accomplice - Affirmative and negative ACCOUNTS- Guardian-Failure to file - Citation - No limitation of time. ACTIONS- Municipal corporations-Appropriation of property-Action in ADMINISTRATORS AND EXECUTORS - Appointment of administrator de bonis non-Mandamus ADVERTISEMENT – State highway laws - Failure to advertise for bids - Section 1206, Advertisement - - Amendments. ADVERTISEMENT —Continued. - - proceedings cured, when - Act of December 18, 1919 (108 O. AFFIRMANCES - Supreme court-Weight of evidence Rule 19. See Bayles v. AFFIRMATIVE TESTIMONY — Defined - Weight and value-Charge to jury-Criminal law. AGENCY- Fire insurance-Knowledge of agent imputed to company, when AGRICULTURAL BOARD- - Inspection of feed stuffs - Constitutional law-Licensing of AIDERS AND ABETTORS- - Criminal law - Evidence - Testimony of accomplice — Affirma- AMENDMENTS- - - - Acts revived or amended Section 16, Article 2, Constitution - - Statutes Pending proceedings affected, how-Section 26, Gen- |