RANNEY-ALTON MERCANTILE COMPANY et al., February 26, 1902. Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. James H. Hayden for the appellee. CORDELIA BOTKIN, Plaintiff in Error, v. L. BUCKI & SON LUMBER COMPANY, PetiPEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. [No. 422.] In Error to the Superior Court of the City tioner, v. ATLANTIC LUMBER COMPANY. [No. 621.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the and County of San Francisco, State of Cali-United States Circuit Court of Appeals for fornia. Mr. George A. Knight for plaintiff in er ror. Messrs. Tirey L. Ford and A. A. Moore for defendant in error. March 3, 1902. Dismissed, with costs, on authority of counsel for the plaintiff in er ror. FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, USE, ETC., OF THE CHAPIN-HALL LUMBER COMPANY. [No. 400.] In Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mr. Louis Marshall for plaintiff in error. Messrs. L. Laflin Kellogg and Abram J. Rose for defendant in error. March 17, 1902. Dismissed, per stipulation. CONRAD D. MAUBER, Petitioner, v. EDWARD Mr. Hector T. Fenton for petitioner. ROBERT PERRIN, Appellant, D. UNITED STATES. [No. 97.] Appeal from the Court of Private Land Claims. Messrs. John T. Morgan and Rochester Ford for appellant. Attorney General for appellee. April 7, 1902. Dismissed, per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Richards for the appellee. ANIMARIUM COMPANY, Petitioner, v. JAMES Mr. Lysander Hill for petitioner. April 14, 1902. Denied. ANTHONY L. DE GIGNAC et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES. [No. 620.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Mr. Wm. S. Forrest for petitioners. Attorney General, Solicitor General Richards, and Mr. S. H. Bethea for respondent. April 14, 1902. Denied. the Fifth Circuit. Messrs. H. Bisbee, Geo. C. Bedell and J. E. Padgett for petitioner. Mr. Richard H. Liggett for respondent. UNITED STATES, Petitioner, v. A. KLIPSTEIN & Co. [No. 624.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Attorney General, Solicitor General Richards, and Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for petitioner. Mr. Albert Comstock for respondent. MARY A. WALTERS, Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. CHICAGO, BUBLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY. [No. 216.] In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Mr. N. C. Abbott for plaintiff in error. Messrs. J. W. Deweese and Chas. F. Manderson for defendant in error. April 14, 1902. Judgment affirmed with costs, on the authority of St. Louis & 8. F. R. Co. v. James, 161 U. S. 545, 40 L. ed. 802, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 621; Louisville, N. A. & C. R. Co. v. Louisville Bkg. Co. 174 U. S. 552, 43 L. ed. 1081, 19 Sup. Ct. Rep. 817. 1 CLARKSBURG ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY, | LUI TSY TSIN, Appellant, v. UNITED States. Plaintiff in Error, v. CITY OF CLARKS BURG et al. [No. 233.] [No. 700.] Appeal from the District Court of the In Error to the Supreme Court of Ap- United States for the Southern District of peals of the State of West Virginia. New York. Alessrs. W. P. Hubbard and John Bassel for plaintiff in error. June 2, 1902. Docketed and dismissed, on motion of Mr. Assistant Attorney Gen Messi 8. M. F. Snider and Jno. W. Davis eral Hoyt for the appellee. for defendants in error. April 21, 1902. Dismissed, with costs, on motion of Mr. John Bassel for the plaintill in enor. WILLIAM H. MOSES et al., Administrators, etc.. Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES. [No. 543.] In Eno to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Mr. J. J. Darlington for plaintiffs in er ror. Attorney General for defendant in error. April 25, 1902. Dismissed, on motion of Mr. J. J. Darlington for the plaintiffs in error. JULIAN SANDOVAL et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES. [No. 683.] Appeal from the Court of Private Land Claims. May 19, 1902. Docketed and dismissed, on motion of Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Hoyt for the appellee. MARSHALL M. MILLER et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES. [No. 682.] Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. May 19, 1902. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Hoyt for the appellee. ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY, Petitioner, v. WARREN G. FURRY. [No. 678.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Mr. L. F. Parker for petitioner. Messrs. Joseph M. Hill and James Briz. zolard for respondent. June 2, 1902. Denied. MARSHALL M. MILLER et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES. [No. 680.] Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Mr. George Clark for petitioners. Attorney General and Solicitor General Richards for respondent. June 2, 1902. Denied. Ju FOOK UNITER PUN, Appellant, v. STATES [No. 701]; WING LONG and Loy KEE, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES [NC 702]; YOUNG SHANG LEE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 703]; LEE LUI SING and LUI NAM, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES. [No. 704.] Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. June 2, 1902. Docketed and dismissed, on motion of Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for the appellee. CHIN LEONG GOON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 705]; LOUIS PANG LUNG, Appellant v. UNITED STATES [No. 706]; LING QUONG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 707]; LING MING, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 708]; WONG Soo Bow, Ap peilant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 709]; WONG FAT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 710]; WONG HONG YIP, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 711]; WONG CHоw, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 712]; WONG SIC LOON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 713]; WONG KING, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 714]; WONG AH SIN, Appellant; v. UNITED STATES [No. 715]; WONG SIC CHUNG, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES [No. 716]; WONG SOW SIN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES. [No. 717.] Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the District of Vermont. June 2, 1902. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for the appellee. NEW JERSEY STEEL & IRON COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. FREDERICK CHORMANN. [No. 454.] In Error to the Circuit Court of the EDWIN L. VETTER, Plaintiff in Error, v. United States for the Southern District of New York. UNITED STATES. [No. 699.] In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. June 2, 1902. Docketed and dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Richards for the defendant in error. Supreme Court of the United States. OCTOBER TERM, 1901. ORDER. The reporter having represented that, owing to the number of decisions at the present term, it will be impracticable to put the reports in one volume, it is therefore now here ordered that he publish an additional volume in this year, pursuant to see tion 681 of the Revised Statutes. February 3, 1902. APPENDIX II. Supreme Court of the United States. OCTOBER TERM, 1901. ORDER. It is now here ordered by the court that all the cases on the docket not decided and all the other business of the term not disposed of by the court be, and the same are hereby, continued until the next term of the court. June 2, 1902. |