Implementation of the Agricultural Risk Protection Act: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities and Risk Management of the Committee on Agriculture, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session, February 13, 2002U.S. Government Printing Office, 2002 - 67 lappuses |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abuse acres additional Administrator Agricultural Risk Protection Answer ARPA awarded Board BOB ETHERIDGE Chairman COMMODITIES AND RISK compliance Congress contract cost of production cotton crop insurance companies crop insurance program data mining data reconciliation DOOLEY evaluate farm bill Farm Service Agency farmers FCIC Feasibility Study Federal Crop Insurance fiscal focus group fraud GIL GUTKNECHT growers HONOR identified implementation increased initial insurance products insurance providers issue JERRY MORAN JOE BACA levels of coverage loan rate loss adjusters ment MIKE MCINTYRE million North Dakota participants percent pilot program premium prevented planting price election PUTNAM quality loss Question reinsured research and development revenue coverage RICK LARSEN Risk Management Agency risk management tools Risk Protection Act RMA and FSA RMA's SAM GRAVES SAXBY CHAMBLISS silage sorghum specialty crop producers Standard Reinsurance Agreement STENHOLM subcommittee T-yields Thank THUNE tion underserved underwriting gains USDA WITT yield
Populāri fragmenti
14. lappuse - That is not what I am talking about. I am talking about, for example, the Mad River, or the Naugatuck River, which are not navigable.
52. lappuse - Montana, located in the north central part of the state about 35 miles from the Canadian border.
25. lappuse - In other words, even if a producer has a total crop loss in any year, the yield used for that year to calculate the producer's APH will not be lower than 60 percent of the historical average production for the region.