The JAG Journal, 32. sējums,1. izdevumsOffice of the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy, 1982 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 36.
2. lappuse
... issues not specified by any litigant is one such perspective previously addressed in these 2. In addition , for a time , several civilian law reviews regularly carried articles on military law . For a short while , the Miami Law ...
... issues not specified by any litigant is one such perspective previously addressed in these 2. In addition , for a time , several civilian law reviews regularly carried articles on military law . For a short while , the Miami Law ...
3. lappuse
... Issues by the United States Court of Military Appeals , 31 JAG J. 99 ( 1980 ) . 8. BROSMAN , Foreword to R. EVERETT , MILITARY JUSTICE IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES iii ( 1956 ) . See also Waltz , supra note 3 . 9. According ...
... Issues by the United States Court of Military Appeals , 31 JAG J. 99 ( 1980 ) . 8. BROSMAN , Foreword to R. EVERETT , MILITARY JUSTICE IN THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES iii ( 1956 ) . See also Waltz , supra note 3 . 9. According ...
4. lappuse
... issues of military law . The third includes all those infinite other cases in which military jurisprudence might — like the jurisprudence of any common law jurisdiction - be referred to for whatever persuasive value or precedential ...
... issues of military law . The third includes all those infinite other cases in which military jurisprudence might — like the jurisprudence of any common law jurisdiction - be referred to for whatever persuasive value or precedential ...
5. lappuse
... issues of military law ( as in the first two categories identified above ) , the civilian courts have not afforded particu- lar deference to those few military decisions that may have been brought to their attention . Some of this is ...
... issues of military law ( as in the first two categories identified above ) , the civilian courts have not afforded particu- lar deference to those few military decisions that may have been brought to their attention . Some of this is ...
6. lappuse
... issues raised here " ) . 24. Jackson v . McElroy , 163 F. Supp . 257 , 266 ( D.D.C. 1958 ) . 25. See , e.g. , Middendorf v . Henry , 425 U.S. 25 , 43 ( 1976 ) ( " normally entitled to great deference ” when " [ d ] ealing with areas of ...
... issues raised here " ) . 24. Jackson v . McElroy , 163 F. Supp . 257 , 266 ( D.D.C. 1958 ) . 25. See , e.g. , Middendorf v . Henry , 425 U.S. 25 , 43 ( 1976 ) ( " normally entitled to great deference ” when " [ d ] ealing with areas of ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
action Administration Armed Forces Article 2(4 attack authority Ayatollah Bani-Sadr British civilian Commander in Chief committed CONG Congress congressional Constitution Corfu Corfu Channel Court of Military Courts-Martial crisis customary international law decision declaration defense DEP'T digest diplomatic law diplomatic premises economic Embassy Executive federal foreign affairs foreign policy Framers Government hostages innocent passage International Court international law involved Iran Iran's Iranian key number Khomeini legislative limited ment militants Military Appeals Military Justice Reporter military law Military Review mission Mossadegh naval forces Navy November opinion peace personnel political Powers Act President Carter President's protection release resolution rule sanctions sanctions against Iran Secretary Security Council seizure self-defense Senate Sess Shah Shah's Soviet Stat straits Supp supra note supra note 24 t]he Tehran territorial sea tion treaty U.S. Navy UN Charter United Nations United Nations Charter Vienna Convention War Powers Act