| United States. Patent Office - 1965 - 1116 lapas
...State may, in appropriate circumstances, require that goods, whether patented or unpatented, be labeled or that other precautionary steps be taken to prevent...from misleading purchasers as to the source of the goods.8 But because of the Federal patent laws a State may not, when the article is unpatented and... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1971 - 770 lapas
...State may, in appropriate circumstances, require that goods, whether patented or unpatented, be labeled or that other precautionary steps be taken to prevent customers from being misled as to the source . . ." This should dispose completely of any argument that Amendment 23 is unconstitutional. Neither... | |
| Th. C. J. A. van Engelen - 1994 - 535 lapas
...State may, in appropriate circumstances, require that goods, whether patented or unpatented, be labeled or that other precautionary steps be taken to prevent...source, just as it may protect businesses in the use oftheir trademarks, labels or distinctive dress in the packaging of goods so as to prevent others,... | |
| Patrick J. Flinn - 2000 - 1388 lapas
...latter was directed towards avoiding consumer confusion. "The Sears Court made it plain that the States 'may protect businesses in the use of their trademarks,...misleading purchasers as to the source of the goods.' "62 As long as the states were regulating the traditional subject matter of unfair competition ... | |
| Christopher Heath - 2004 - 275 lapas
...The Bonito court likened it to a "product-by-process" patent, 9 USPQ 2d 1847 (S. Ct., 1989) at 1855. distinctive dress in the packaging of goods so as...from misleading purchasers as to the source of the goods."156 Such laws were implicitly to prevent consumer confusion as to source. Thus, in parallel... | |
| |