Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

xament,

Docket No. 501

[graphic]

most of the commissions paid by Madison Financial to Madison Estate, which significantly derives all of its business from Madison Financial.

retained the

LO

Many of the sales, which generated these commissions, were
ladison
McDougal-Henley Groun members who are acting as straw buvers.
Guaranty essentially
risks of ownershin on these
transactions because it fully financed these sales including the casa
sales commissions. Thus, ladison Guaranty's position deteriorated
because it retained the same ownership risks as before, but paid casn
fees to these individuals. In addition, fess paid through ladison
Real Farte were used 31 down payment in some of the tw lanй
purchases in an apparent attempt to disguise 100% funding of the
purchase by Madison Guaranty and its subsidiaries.

Messe. McDougal and Latham cited an April 24, 1985 letter from a
Federal llome Loan Bank of Dallas Supervisory Agent as permission to
However,
pay real estate sales commissions to Madison Real Estate.
review
this letter in parc. asks that the Board of Directors
Insurance Regulation 571.7 which is cited above in this comment.

кис

Let

[blocks in formation]

X

3.

Madison Marketing is paid for doing all the general advertising for
Madison Guaranty and most of the advertising for Hadison Financial's
land development project. All of Madison Marketing's business is
Since 1983 these
derived from Hadison Guaranty or its subsidiaries.
payments total $1.537,000. til February 1986, Susan Mc Dougal owned
Madison Marketing. During a portion of this time, it was a cor-
noration which was incorporated by Lisa Aunspaugh, reportedly a close
friend of Susan Mc Dougal.

Mr. 1.1cham stated that after February 1986, Madison Marketing became
an entity "d/b/a (dning business as)" for Madison Financial and ceased
to be a corporacion. However, it is not registered as a "d/b/a" in
the County records. Also. its checking account has never been
recorded on the books of Madison Financial.

Given the evidence of Madison Marketing's invoices, it is questionable
how much of these advertising services are actually performed by the
firm. The actual work of advertising, such as the design and
production of commercials and providing air time or newspaper space,
appears to be performed by others. Madison Marketing apparently just
pavs the bills of other providers and adds a 15% fee of its own.
Examiners estimated this fee to be approximately $200,000 since 1983.
It would appear that Madison Guaranty could have an emplovee perform
similar work for much less money.

Mr. Latham stated that Madison Marketing made no payments to any
to and
sto kholders. This statement is false. As a part of a test for such
payments, the examiners discovered Lvo remittances from Madison
Market ing to Susan Mc Doneal which total $50,000. This was a test, and
there may be additional payments.

Designer's Construction

Designer's Construction cerforms construction work on some of the land
development projects and on some of the property securing Madison
Guaranty loans. In 1985 and to date in 1986, $247,000 was paid for
work performed for Madison Guaranty and its subsidiaries. The amount
of loan proceed raid to Designer's Construction on work for third
party borrowers is unknown. Designer's Construction appears to be n

[ocr errors][merged small]
[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][merged small]

Payment of Clinton Loan by Madison S&L Subsidiary

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Interim CEO Altman has asked me to respond to your request for records pertaining to Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan contained in your letter of December 9, 1993. This response also pertains to the memorandum prepared by your staff entitled "Right of a Ranking Minority Member for Access to Agency Records," dated January 14, 1994 (Memorandum).

The Memorandum was in response to concerns which RTC staff raised at a meeting with Mr. Joseph Seidel, Minority General Counsel, and other members of your staff, including whether you were making your request in your individual capacity or on behalf of a committee or subcommittee of the Congress. As you may know from our discussions with your staff, the RTC is concerned that disclosure of different categories of information could constitute a waiver of one or more privileges to which the agency is entitled, or, result in the release of personal or corporate financial information in violation of Federal law.

At the time we raised these concerns, your staff offered to supply us with a legal memorandum that would show that (1) you as the Ranking Minority Member had authority commensurate to a Committee Chairman's with regard to access to agency information; and (2) regardless of your standing, you had absolute access as a Member of Congress to any agency record. The RTC has reviewed the Memorandum and the relevant law and authority. Despite our desire to cooperate with you, the agency must continue to take the position that a Ranking Minority Member has the authority of an individual Member of Congress and therefore may only obtain information that would be otherwise available to the public pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. Moreover, the RTC believes that disclosing privileged information to you could raise questions of waiver and could detrimentally affect any further legal actions that may be contemplated regarding Madison.

Notwithstanding the different conclusion the RTC has reached on this issue, we will continue to review the status of legal proceedings relating to Madison, and consider whether we can prudently disclose

801 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20434

any additional information. We have thoroughly cooperated with your request providing thousands of pages of documents. We have also given your request the highest priority in order to respond in as timely a manner as possible. In the interim, we will continue to work with your staff to make available to you as many records possible within the limitations discussed above.

Sincerely,

as

John E. Ryan
Deputy CEO

15991

RTC

RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION

Resolving The Crisis
Restoring The Confidence

February 1, 1994

The Honorable Alfonse M. D'Amato

Ranking Minority Member
Committee on Banking, Finance
and Urban Affairs
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator D'Amato:

On January 11 and January 25, 1994 you wrote to me concerning the statute of limitations relating to Madison Guaranty Savings and Loan of McCrory, Arkansas ("Madison"). I want to assure you that the Resolution Trust Corporation is conducting a thorough review of the potential civil claims it possesses as a result of the failure of Madison. The RTC is, of course, mindful of the impending February 28 anniversary date of the federal takeover of Madison.

If such claims do exist, the RTC will vigorously pursue all appropriate remedies using standard procedures in such cases, which could include seeking agreements to toll the statute of limitations. As you noted, the barriers presented by the expiration of the statute of limitations in many cases have been ameliorated by the extension of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA) statutes in the RTC Completion Act (Act). The Act has afforded the RTC an opportunity to investigate further any civil claims which may be asserted against individuals or entities associated with Madison Guaranty for fraud, intentional misconduct resulting in unjust enrichment, or intentional misconduct resulting in substantial loss to the institution. As you know, the RTC's jurisdiction is solely as to civil claims. Any potential criminal matters are within the jurisdiction of the Justice Department.

[blocks in formation]

Sincerely,

Кекен

Roger C. Altman
Interim CEO

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »