Agriculture Decisions: Decisions of the Secretary of Agriculture Under the Regulatory Laws Administered in the United States Department of Agriculture, 62. sējums,3-4. daļasU.S. Government Printing Office, 2003 Up to 1988, the December issue contains a cumulative list of decisions reported for the year, by act, docket numbers arranged in consecutive order, and cumulative subject-index, by act. |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 22.
262. lappuse
... final agency order " within 60 days after its entry . " 28 U.S.C. § 2344. Here , the order at issue is date - stamped February 14 , 2002. Respondents ' Appendix ( RA ) 1. Although PMD Produce Brokerage Corp. ( PMD ) did not file its ...
... final agency order " within 60 days after its entry . " 28 U.S.C. § 2344. Here , the order at issue is date - stamped February 14 , 2002. Respondents ' Appendix ( RA ) 1. Although PMD Produce Brokerage Corp. ( PMD ) did not file its ...
263. lappuse
... final order's date of entry , particularly in light of the documentary evidence submitted by the USDA , which uniformly supports the conclusion that the final order was entered and mailed on February 14 , 2002. See RA 9-22 . PMD's ...
... final order's date of entry , particularly in light of the documentary evidence submitted by the USDA , which uniformly supports the conclusion that the final order was entered and mailed on February 14 , 2002. See RA 9-22 . PMD's ...
266. lappuse
... final Decision and Order . Additional conclusions by the Judicial Officer follow the ALJ's conclusions of law , as restated . Petitioner introduced no exhibits . Respondent introduced 17 exhibits admitted into evidence at the July 12 ...
... final Decision and Order . Additional conclusions by the Judicial Officer follow the ALJ's conclusions of law , as restated . Petitioner introduced no exhibits . Respondent introduced 17 exhibits admitted into evidence at the July 12 ...
301. lappuse
... Decision and Order will become final and effective thirty - five ( 35 ) days after service upon the Respondent unless appealed within thirty ( 30 ) days as provided by the Rules of Practice and Procedure , NICK PENACHIO CO . , INC . 301.
... Decision and Order will become final and effective thirty - five ( 35 ) days after service upon the Respondent unless appealed within thirty ( 30 ) days as provided by the Rules of Practice and Procedure , NICK PENACHIO CO . , INC . 301.
311. lappuse
... final Decision and Order . Additional conclusions by the Judicial Officer follow the ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law , as restated . Petitioner's exhibits are designated by " PX . " Respondent's exhibits are designated by ...
... final Decision and Order . Additional conclusions by the Judicial Officer follow the ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law , as restated . Petitioner's exhibits are designated by " PX . " Respondent's exhibits are designated by ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
1999 through January 58 Agric 62 Agric accepted in interstate actively involved activities resulting Administrative Law Judge agreed purchase prices Agricultural Commodities Act Agricultural Marketing Service alleged Arminda Cano bankruptcy broker Buckhannon CARX commission merchant Complainant Complainant's connected with Jacobson corporation court Decision and Order Denice & Filice Department of Agriculture dismissal failed to pay February 21 fee-shifting fees and expenses Filice Packing Finding of Fact flagrant and repeated Fresh Valley Food frozen foods full payment promptly issued Jacobson Produce Judicial Officer June lots of perishable Michael Norinsberg October PACA Docket PACA license application Penachio percent of Jacobson period perishable agricultural commodities Petitioner was responsibly Petitioner's Practice 7 C.F.R. prevailing party pursuant to Section reparation award repeated violations Respondent filed responsibly connected Ruben Castillo Rules of Practice Secretary section 2(4 sellers surety bond tomatoes transaction Valley Food Service violated the PACA violation of section