Politics, Markets, and Grand Strategy: Foreign Economic Policies as Strategic InstrumentsWhy do states sometimes discriminate in favor of certain states and at other times choose to pursue nondiscriminatory policies? In answering these questions, Lars S. Skålnes stresses the international political importance of foreign economic policy, arguing that trade, foreign investment, and foreign aid policies are strategic instruments great powers use to manage political and military relations with allies and adversaries. Skålnes explains changes in foreign economic policy in terms of shifting strategic assessments regarding the importance of military support from allies. When states need military support from their allies to meet threats to their security, they will adopt discriminatory foreign economic policies in an attempt to strengthen alliance relations. When states can go it alone without military support, by contrast, they will not pursue foreign economic policies that discriminate in favor of either allies or other countries. Discriminatory policies, Skalnes argues, are important strategic instruments for several reasons. First, they can be used to tie countries to a military alliance. Second, they are useful as signals of intention. Third, discriminatory policies may strengthen an ally militarily by increasing the economic resources available for military purposes. Skålnes provides detailed accounts of the grand strategies of Germany (1879-1914), France (1887-1914), Great Britain (1919-1939), and the United States (1945-1967). Politics, Markets, and Grand Strategy will be important reading for scholars and students in the fields of national security studies, international political economy, and economic history, and to economists working on problems associated with foreign investment and trade generally and customs union theory and discriminatory trade agreements specifically. Lars S. Skålnes is Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Oregon. |
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Strategic Need and Economic Discrimination | 15 |
German Grand Strategy 18791914 | 39 |
French Grand Strategy 18871914 | 71 |
British Grand Strategy 191939 | 109 |
U S Grand Strategy 194567 | 151 |
Conclusion | 189 |
227 | |
245 | |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Politics, Markets, and Grand Strategy: Foreign Economic Policies as ... Lars S. Skålnes Fragmentu skats - 2000 |
Politics, Markets, and Grand Strategy: Foreign Economic Policies as ... Lars S. Skålnes Fragmentu skats - 2000 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
adopt adversary agreed agreement alliance allies American appeasement argued argument assessments attack Austria-Hungary Austrian avoid banks bonds Britain British cabinet capital closer commitment concerned concessions Conclusions considerations considered continued countries depend designed despite developed difficult discriminate in favor discussion domestic domestic political Dominions duties effect efforts empire European evidence example exports forces foreign economic policies France France's French French government Germany Germany's grand strategy grant hypothesis important improve increase industrial interests investment issue Italy Japan Japanese less loan maintain meeting military million Minister motives negotiations nomic officials particular percent plans policymakers political possible preferences pressures problem provides pursue rates reasons reduce reflect regarded relations remained role Russian shows signal situation Soviet Union strengthen tariff threat trade trade treaty treaty Triple United Western Europe
Atsauces uz šo grāmatu
Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an ... Edward Deering Mansfield,Brian M. Pollins Ierobežota priekšskatīšana - 2009 |