 Commission has indicated that the "full context in which the material appeared is critically important,"13 and has articulated three "principal factors" for its analysis: w( I ) the explicitness or graphic nature of the description or depiction of sexual...  "Can you say that on TV?": an examination of the FCC's enforcement with ... - 25. lappuseautors: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet - 2004 - 107 lapasPilnskats - Par šo grāmatu
 | James C. Goodale, Rob Frieden - 2021 - 966 lapas
...Enforcement Policies Regarding Broadcast Indecency, 16 FCC Red. 7999 (2001). 67'9 Id. at 8002. 67.10 depiction of sexual or excretory organs or activities;...descriptions of sexual or excretory organs or activities; (3) whether the material appears to pander or is used to titillate, or whether the material appears... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 2001 - 908 lapas
...Comparisons 10. The principal factors that have proved significant in our decisions to date are: (1) the explicitness or graphic nature of the description...descriptions of sexual or excretory organs or activities; (3) whether the material appears to pander or is used to titillate, or whether the material appears... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 2005 - 1024 lapas
...is critically important,"13 and has articulated three "principal factors" for its analysis: w( I ) the explicitness or graphic nature of the description...descriptions of sexual or excretory organs or activities; (3) whether the material appears to pander or is used to titillate, or whether the material appears... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 2003 - 748 lapas
...three factors are particularly relevant: (1) the explicitness or graphic nature of the description; (2) whether the material dwells on or repeats at length...material appears to pander or is used to titillate or shock. See Indecency Policy Statement, supra, 16 FCC Red at 8003^10. 8. Applying the definition of... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 2004 - 716 lapas
...significant to this contextual analysis: (1) the explicitness or graphic nature of the description; (2) whether the material dwells on or repeats at length...material appears to pander or is used to titillate or shock.14 In examining these three factors, we must weigh and balance them to determine whether the... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 2004 - 780 lapas
...significant to this contextual analysis: (1) the explicitness or graphic nature of the description; (2) whether the material dwells on or repeats at length...material appears to pander or is used to titillate or shock.21 In examining these three factors, we must weigh and balance them to determine whether the... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 2004 - 1006 lapas
...16 FCC Red at 8002, \ 9 (emphasis in original). explicitness or graphic nature of the description; (2) whether the material dwells on or repeats at length...whether the material appears to pander or is used to titii'^e or shock.25 In examining these three factors, we must weigh and balance them to determine... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 2006 - 1102 lapas
...significant to this contextual analysis: (1) the explicitness or graphic nature of the description; (2) whether the material dwells on or repeats at length...organs or activities; and (3) whether the material panders to, titillates, or shocks the audience." In examining these three factors, we must weigh and... | |
 | United States. Federal Communications Commission - 2005 - 836 lapas
...is critically important,"13 and has articulated three "principal factors" for its analysis: "( 1 ) the explicitness or graphic nature of the description...sexual or excretory organs or activities; (2) whether die material dwells on or repeats at length descriptions of sexual or excretory organs or activities;... | |
 | 2007 - 176 lapas
...significant in recent decisions in determining whether broadcast material is patently offensive: (1) the explicitness or graphic nature of the description...activities; (2) whether the material dwells on or repeats al length descriptions of sexual or excretory organs or activities; (3) whether the material appears... | |
| |
