Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and Comments |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 91.
19. lappuse
... members in which they had exclusive or constituted a horizontal restraint and a de facto exclusive licenses to sell the as- per se violation of the Sherman Act , sociation's private label brands , together though no price fixing was ...
... members in which they had exclusive or constituted a horizontal restraint and a de facto exclusive licenses to sell the as- per se violation of the Sherman Act , sociation's private label brands , together though no price fixing was ...
126. lappuse
15 U.S.C. S 45 ( a ) ( 6 ) . as As S & H sees it § 5 empowers the Commission to restrain only such practices as are either in violation of the antitrust laws , deceptive , or repugnant ...
15 U.S.C. S 45 ( a ) ( 6 ) . as As S & H sees it § 5 empowers the Commission to restrain only such practices as are either in violation of the antitrust laws , deceptive , or repugnant ...
177. lappuse
335 and 463 . because of refusal of lessor , in violation Argued March 5 , 1968 . of Sherman Anti - Trust Act , to sell maDecided June 17 , 1968 . chinery , could treat outcome of prior Rehearings Denied Oct. 14 , 1968 . civil action by ...
335 and 463 . because of refusal of lessor , in violation Argued March 5 , 1968 . of Sherman Anti - Trust Act , to sell maDecided June 17 , 1968 . chinery , could treat outcome of prior Rehearings Denied Oct. 14 , 1968 . civil action by ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Main Volume | 13 |
Main Volume Supp Read Aftor | 69 |
Trade Association Activities of Antitrust | 75 |
6 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and Comments Saul Chesterfield Oppenheim,Glen E. Weston Fragmentu skats - 1968 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acquire acquisition action agree agreement amended antitrust laws application arrangement Autolite brand challenge charge Cite claim Clayton Act clear combination Commission compete competition competitors conduct consider corporation Court of Appeals customers damages decision decree defendant Department determining District Court economic effect enforcement entered entry established evidence exclusive existing fact Federal findings firm force Ford Government granted Hazeltine held holding illegal important independent industry interest involved issue Judge judgment Justice L.Ed leasing less license limited manufacturer ment mergers Monopolies offer operating opinion parties patent period petition petitioner plug pool position practices present profits prove provisions purchase question reason respect respondent restraint restrictions result royalties rule S.Ct sell seller share Sherman Act shoe spark plug standard substantial territorial tion Topco trade trial tying United violation Zenith