Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and CommentsWest Publishing Company, 1968 - 952 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 19.
85. lappuse
... plug manufacturer a more vigorous and effective competitor against others than it had been as an independent . Clayton Act , § 7 , 15 U.S.C.A. § 18 . 2. Monopolies 24 ( 15 ) Relief in an antitrust case must be effective to redress the ...
... plug manufacturer a more vigorous and effective competitor against others than it had been as an independent . Clayton Act , § 7 , 15 U.S.C.A. § 18 . 2. Monopolies 24 ( 15 ) Relief in an antitrust case must be effective to redress the ...
86. lappuse
... plugs and other automotive parts . The acquisition included the Autolite trade name , Autolite's only domestic spark plug plant , and extensive rights to its nationwide distribution organiza- tion for spark plugs and batteries . The ...
... plugs and other automotive parts . The acquisition included the Autolite trade name , Autolite's only domestic spark plug plant , and extensive rights to its nationwide distribution organiza- tion for spark plugs and batteries . The ...
97. lappuse
... plug market . The Court makes two critical errors in order to avoid the effect of this reason- ing . It rejects the factfinding by the District Court in order to uphold its re- medial order ; and it repeats that court's error by ...
... plug market . The Court makes two critical errors in order to avoid the effect of this reason- ing . It rejects the factfinding by the District Court in order to uphold its re- medial order ; and it repeats that court's error by ...
Saturs
Monopolies 171 | 2 |
Administration Remedies and Enforcement | 52 |
Main Volume Supp Read After | 69 |
5 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and Comments Saul Chesterfield Oppenheim,Glen E. Weston Fragmentu skats - 1968 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acquisition action Adkins agreement amended anti anticompetitive antitrust laws Autolite brand buyer Cite as 89 Clayton Act competition competitors conglomerate mergers Corp corporation Court of Appeals customers damage period decision decree defendant District Court divestiture doctrine economic effect enforcement entry estoppel F.Supp Federal Trade Commission findings firm Ford Hazeltine illegal industry injunction issue judgment Justice L.Ed Lear leasing license mandate market power market share ment monopoly oligopoly opinion pari delicto parties Paso patent misuse patent pool petition petitioner plaintiff plug market practices prohibition provisions purchase Radio reason remanded respondent restraint restrictions royalties rule S.Ct sell seller Sherman Act Sherman Anti-Trust Act shoe machinery shoe manufacturer spark plug statute substantial supra Supreme Court territorial tied product tion Topco treble damages trial court trust laws tying arrangement U. S. Steel unfair United United's unlawful violation Zenith