Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and CommentsWest Publishing Company, 1968 - 952 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 60.
81. lappuse
... mergers are mergers that are neither horizontal nor vertical as those terms are used in sections I and II , respectively , of these guidelines . ( It should be noted that a market extension merger , i . e . , one involving two firms ...
... mergers are mergers that are neither horizontal nor vertical as those terms are used in sections I and II , respectively , of these guidelines . ( It should be noted that a market extension merger , i . e . , one involving two firms ...
83. lappuse
... mergers not inconsistent with the standards of this paragraph 19 . 20. Mergers Which Entrench Market Power and Other Conglomerate Mergers . The Department will ordinarily investi- gate the possibility of anticompetitive con- sequences ...
... mergers not inconsistent with the standards of this paragraph 19 . 20. Mergers Which Entrench Market Power and Other Conglomerate Mergers . The Department will ordinarily investi- gate the possibility of anticompetitive con- sequences ...
220. lappuse
... mergers are not ex- plainable in terms of obvious efficiencies in integrating the production or market- ing facilities of the firms involved . The merger movement has contributed to and is furthered by a specialized " merger mar- ket ...
... mergers are not ex- plainable in terms of obvious efficiencies in integrating the production or market- ing facilities of the firms involved . The merger movement has contributed to and is furthered by a specialized " merger mar- ket ...
Saturs
Monopolies 171 | 2 |
Administration Remedies and Enforcement | 52 |
Main Volume Supp Read After | 69 |
5 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and Comments Saul Chesterfield Oppenheim,Glen E. Weston Fragmentu skats - 1968 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acquisition action Adkins agreement amended anti anticompetitive antitrust laws Autolite brand buyer Cite as 89 Clayton Act competition competitors conglomerate mergers Corp corporation Court of Appeals customers damage period decision decree defendant District Court divestiture doctrine economic effect enforcement entry estoppel F.Supp Federal Trade Commission findings firm Ford Hazeltine illegal industry injunction issue judgment Justice L.Ed Lear leasing license mandate market power market share ment monopoly oligopoly opinion pari delicto parties Paso patent misuse patent pool petition petitioner plaintiff plug market practices prohibition provisions purchase Radio reason remanded respondent restraint restrictions royalties rule S.Ct sell seller Sherman Act Sherman Anti-Trust Act shoe machinery shoe manufacturer spark plug statute substantial supra Supreme Court territorial tied product tion Topco treble damages trial court trust laws tying arrangement U. S. Steel unfair United United's unlawful violation Zenith