Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and CommentsWest Publishing Company, 1968 - 952 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 12.
32. lappuse
... intent that a " rule of reason " be applied in mak- ing such case - by - case determinations . Standard Oil Co. v . United States , 221 U.S. 1 , 60 , 31 S.Ct. 502 , 515 , 55 L.Ed. 619 ( 1911 ) . And that rule of reason was to be applied ...
... intent that a " rule of reason " be applied in mak- ing such case - by - case determinations . Standard Oil Co. v . United States , 221 U.S. 1 , 60 , 31 S.Ct. 502 , 515 , 55 L.Ed. 619 ( 1911 ) . And that rule of reason was to be applied ...
74. lappuse
... intent . ment intent . Accordingly , the Depart- ment's enforcement activity under Section 7 is directed primarily toward the identifi- cation and prevention of those mergers which alter market structure in ways likely now or eventually ...
... intent . ment intent . Accordingly , the Depart- ment's enforcement activity under Section 7 is directed primarily toward the identifi- cation and prevention of those mergers which alter market structure in ways likely now or eventually ...
187. lappuse
... intent to monopolize . To prior to those cases potential antitrust defendants would have been justified in thinking that then current antitrust doc- trines permitted them to do all acts con- ducive to the creation or maintenance of a ...
... intent to monopolize . To prior to those cases potential antitrust defendants would have been justified in thinking that then current antitrust doc- trines permitted them to do all acts con- ducive to the creation or maintenance of a ...
Saturs
Monopolies 171 | 2 |
Administration Remedies and Enforcement | 52 |
Main Volume Supp Read After | 69 |
5 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and Comments Saul Chesterfield Oppenheim,Glen E. Weston Fragmentu skats - 1968 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acquisition action Adkins agreement amended anti anticompetitive antitrust laws Autolite brand buyer Cite as 89 Clayton Act competition competitors conglomerate mergers Corp corporation Court of Appeals customers damage period decision decree defendant District Court divestiture doctrine economic effect enforcement entry estoppel F.Supp Federal Trade Commission findings firm Ford Hazeltine illegal industry injunction issue judgment Justice L.Ed Lear leasing license mandate market power market share ment monopoly oligopoly opinion pari delicto parties Paso patent misuse patent pool petition petitioner plaintiff plug market practices prohibition provisions purchase Radio reason remanded respondent restraint restrictions royalties rule S.Ct sell seller Sherman Act Sherman Anti-Trust Act shoe machinery shoe manufacturer spark plug statute substantial supra Supreme Court territorial tied product tion Topco treble damages trial court trust laws tying arrangement U. S. Steel unfair United United's unlawful violation Zenith