Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and CommentsWest Publishing Company, 1968 - 952 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 59.
194. lappuse
... Defendant violated § 2 of the Sher- man Act , 15 U.S.C.A. § 2 , by monop- olizing the shoe machinery trade and commerce among the several States . Defendant violated the same section of the law by monopolizing that part of the ...
... Defendant violated § 2 of the Sher- man Act , 15 U.S.C.A. § 2 , by monop- olizing the shoe machinery trade and commerce among the several States . Defendant violated the same section of the law by monopolizing that part of the ...
197. lappuse
... defendant muffler corporation , were ac- tive participants in program to restrict competition but rather established that alleged illegal scheme was thrust upon plaintiffs by defendant muffler corpora- tion . Sherman Anti - Trust Act ...
... defendant muffler corporation , were ac- tive participants in program to restrict competition but rather established that alleged illegal scheme was thrust upon plaintiffs by defendant muffler corpora- tion . Sherman Anti - Trust Act ...
202. lappuse
... defendant violated the anti- trust laws but that his conduct caused the damages alleged in the complaint . Normally , it would be enough with re- spect to causation if the defendant " ma- terially contributed " to plaintiff's injury ...
... defendant violated the anti- trust laws but that his conduct caused the damages alleged in the complaint . Normally , it would be enough with re- spect to causation if the defendant " ma- terially contributed " to plaintiff's injury ...
Saturs
Monopolies 171 | 2 |
Administration Remedies and Enforcement | 52 |
Main Volume Supp Read After | 69 |
5 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and Comments Saul Chesterfield Oppenheim,Glen E. Weston Fragmentu skats - 1968 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acquisition action Adkins agreement amended anti anticompetitive antitrust laws Autolite brand buyer Cite as 89 Clayton Act competition competitors conglomerate mergers Corp corporation Court of Appeals customers damage period decision decree defendant District Court divestiture doctrine economic effect enforcement entry estoppel F.Supp Federal Trade Commission findings firm Ford Hazeltine illegal industry injunction issue judgment Justice L.Ed Lear leasing license mandate market power market share ment monopoly oligopoly opinion pari delicto parties Paso patent misuse patent pool petition petitioner plaintiff plug market practices prohibition provisions purchase Radio reason remanded respondent restraint restrictions royalties rule S.Ct sell seller Sherman Act Sherman Anti-Trust Act shoe machinery shoe manufacturer spark plug statute substantial supra Supreme Court territorial tied product tion Topco treble damages trial court trust laws tying arrangement U. S. Steel unfair United United's unlawful violation Zenith