Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and CommentsWest Publishing Company, 1968 - 952 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 88.
178. lappuse
... antitrust laws , the buyer does nothing and absorbs the loss , the buyer is entitled to treble damages under the Clayton Act . Clayton Act , § 4 as amended 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 . 7. Monopolies 28 ( 1.6 ) Where seller overcharges buyer in ...
... antitrust laws , the buyer does nothing and absorbs the loss , the buyer is entitled to treble damages under the Clayton Act . Clayton Act , § 4 as amended 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 . 7. Monopolies 28 ( 1.6 ) Where seller overcharges buyer in ...
197. lappuse
... anti- trust law on separate entities . 6. Courts 383 ( 1 ) Where gist of plaintiffs ' cause of action to recover damages allegedly sus- tained by reason of defendants ' alleged violations of antitrust laws was clear from outset ...
... anti- trust law on separate entities . 6. Courts 383 ( 1 ) Where gist of plaintiffs ' cause of action to recover damages allegedly sus- tained by reason of defendants ' alleged violations of antitrust laws was clear from outset ...
212. lappuse
... antitrust laws reflect our Nation's strong commitment to economic freedom and the material benefits that flow from this freedom . The antitrust laws are based on the recognition that optimum use of economic resources and maximum choice ...
... antitrust laws reflect our Nation's strong commitment to economic freedom and the material benefits that flow from this freedom . The antitrust laws are based on the recognition that optimum use of economic resources and maximum choice ...
Saturs
Monopolies 171 | 2 |
Administration Remedies and Enforcement | 52 |
Main Volume Supp Read After | 69 |
5 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and Comments Saul Chesterfield Oppenheim,Glen E. Weston Fragmentu skats - 1968 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acquisition action Adkins agreement amended anti anticompetitive antitrust laws Autolite brand buyer Cite as 89 Clayton Act competition competitors conglomerate mergers Corp corporation Court of Appeals customers damage period decision decree defendant District Court divestiture doctrine economic effect enforcement entry estoppel F.Supp Federal Trade Commission findings firm Ford Hazeltine illegal industry injunction issue judgment Justice L.Ed Lear leasing license mandate market power market share ment monopoly oligopoly opinion pari delicto parties Paso patent misuse patent pool petition petitioner plaintiff plug market practices prohibition provisions purchase Radio reason remanded respondent restraint restrictions royalties rule S.Ct sell seller Sherman Act Sherman Anti-Trust Act shoe machinery shoe manufacturer spark plug statute substantial supra Supreme Court territorial tied product tion Topco treble damages trial court trust laws tying arrangement U. S. Steel unfair United United's unlawful violation Zenith