Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and CommentsWest Publishing Company, 1968 - 952 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 70.
125. lappuse
... Court of Appeals reversed the FTC , holding that the FTC had not demonstrated that S & H's conduct violat- ed § 5 because it had not shown that the conduct contravened either the letter or the spirit of the antitrust laws . Held : 1. The ...
... Court of Appeals reversed the FTC , holding that the FTC had not demonstrated that S & H's conduct violat- ed § 5 because it had not shown that the conduct contravened either the letter or the spirit of the antitrust laws . Held : 1. The ...
131. lappuse
... Court of Appeals inso- far as it limited the unfair practices pro- scribed by § 5 to those contrary to the letter ... Court the Commission argues that how- ever correct the Court of Appeals may be in holding the challenged S & H ...
... Court of Appeals inso- far as it limited the unfair practices pro- scribed by § 5 to those contrary to the letter ... Court the Commission argues that how- ever correct the Court of Appeals may be in holding the challenged S & H ...
156. lappuse
... Court of Appeals set aside entirely the judgments for damages and injunctive relief entered against Hazeltine , ruling that the District Court lacked jurisdic- tion over that company and that the stip- ulation relied upon by the District ...
... Court of Appeals set aside entirely the judgments for damages and injunctive relief entered against Hazeltine , ruling that the District Court lacked jurisdic- tion over that company and that the stip- ulation relied upon by the District ...
Saturs
Monopolies 171 | 2 |
Administration Remedies and Enforcement | 52 |
Main Volume Supp Read After | 69 |
5 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and Comments Saul Chesterfield Oppenheim,Glen E. Weston Fragmentu skats - 1968 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acquisition action Adkins agreement amended anti anticompetitive antitrust laws Autolite brand buyer Cite as 89 Clayton Act competition competitors conglomerate mergers Corp corporation Court of Appeals customers damage period decision decree defendant District Court divestiture doctrine economic effect enforcement entry estoppel F.Supp Federal Trade Commission findings firm Ford Hazeltine illegal industry injunction issue judgment Justice L.Ed Lear leasing license mandate market power market share ment monopoly oligopoly opinion pari delicto parties Paso patent misuse patent pool petition petitioner plaintiff plug market practices prohibition provisions purchase Radio reason remanded respondent restraint restrictions royalties rule S.Ct sell seller Sherman Act Sherman Anti-Trust Act shoe machinery shoe manufacturer spark plug statute substantial supra Supreme Court territorial tied product tion Topco treble damages trial court trust laws tying arrangement U. S. Steel unfair United United's unlawful violation Zenith