Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and CommentsWest Publishing Company, 1968 - 952 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 41.
160. lappuse
... American companies . The pool for many years had the exclusive right to sublicense the patents of its member companies and also those of Hazeltine and a number of other foreign concerns . About 5,000 pat- ents were available to the pool ...
... American companies . The pool for many years had the exclusive right to sublicense the patents of its member companies and also those of Hazeltine and a number of other foreign concerns . About 5,000 pat- ents were available to the pool ...
186. lappuse
... American Tobacco had been found guilty of con- spiracy to restrain trade and of attempt and conspiracy to monopolize as well as of monopolization itself , the grant of certiorari was " limited to the question whether actual exclusion of ...
... American Tobacco had been found guilty of con- spiracy to restrain trade and of attempt and conspiracy to monopolize as well as of monopolization itself , the grant of certiorari was " limited to the question whether actual exclusion of ...
189. lappuse
... American Tobacco decision . Having rejected the contention that Alora - American Tobacco changed the law of monopolization in a way which should be given only prospective effect , it follows that Hanover is entitled to damages for the ...
... American Tobacco decision . Having rejected the contention that Alora - American Tobacco changed the law of monopolization in a way which should be given only prospective effect , it follows that Hanover is entitled to damages for the ...
Saturs
Monopolies 171 | 2 |
Administration Remedies and Enforcement | 52 |
Main Volume Supp Read After | 69 |
5 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Federal Antitrust Laws: Cases and Comments Saul Chesterfield Oppenheim,Glen E. Weston Fragmentu skats - 1968 |
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acquisition action Adkins agreement amended anti anticompetitive antitrust laws Autolite brand buyer Cite as 89 Clayton Act competition competitors conglomerate mergers Corp corporation Court of Appeals customers damage period decision decree defendant District Court divestiture doctrine economic effect enforcement entry estoppel F.Supp Federal Trade Commission findings firm Ford Hazeltine illegal industry injunction issue judgment Justice L.Ed Lear leasing license mandate market power market share ment monopoly oligopoly opinion pari delicto parties Paso patent misuse patent pool petition petitioner plaintiff plug market practices prohibition provisions purchase Radio reason remanded respondent restraint restrictions royalties rule S.Ct sell seller Sherman Act Sherman Anti-Trust Act shoe machinery shoe manufacturer spark plug statute substantial supra Supreme Court territorial tied product tion Topco treble damages trial court trust laws tying arrangement U. S. Steel unfair United United's unlawful violation Zenith