Public Works for Water and Power Development and Atomic Energy Commission Appropriations for Fiscal Year 1972: Hearings Before a Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations, United States Senate, Ninety-second Congress, First Session ...U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971 |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
30 June acre-feet Allocation for FY Allocation FY 1972 Allocations to 30 APPROPRIATION TITLE Balance to Complete Beach BENEFIT-COST RATIO budget budgetary reserve CAMM Cash Contribution Chairman ELLENDER channel improvements Columbia River COMPARISON OF FEDERAL Complete After FY construction cooperation Corps of Engineers County Creek current Federal cost Engineering and Design estimated cost Estimated Federal Cost Estimated Non-Federal Cost Estimated Project Cost facilities Federal cost estimate feet fiscal year 1972 fish and wildlife Flood Control Act flood plain FY 1972 Balance Harbor Illinois Waterway insert the justification June 30 justification follows KELLEY Lake Lands and Damages latest estimate levees located maintenance million Mississippi River Missouri River navigation North Dakota operation Pattonsburg percent placed in budgetary Preconstruction Planning recreation Reimbursement Relocations reservoir River Basin Senator STENNIS spillway square miles storage submitted to Congress SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL DATA Supervision and Administration Total Estimated Project water supply Willamette River
Populāri fragmenti
45. lappuse - and professional appraisers under contract with the Army. The appraisal estimates are developed on the basis of concepts of fair market value as defined by the Federal courts. The owner or his designated representative is given an opportunity to accompany the appraiser during his inspection of the property.
48. lappuse - While these procedures have not yet been adopted, Section 209 of the 1970 Flood Control Act expresses the intent of Congress that these four objectives be included in Federally financed water resource projects, and in the evaluation of benefits and costs attributable thereto, giving due consideration to the most feasible alternative means of accomplishing them.
139. lappuse - OREGON AND WASHINGTON (SECOND POWERHOUSE) Senator STENNIS. Turning over to Bonneville lock and dam, Oregon and Washington, second powerhouse. We will insert the justification in the record at this point. (The
66. lappuse - In selecting these projects, fiscal year 1972 generally was treated as the fourth year O f the 5-year program covering the period fiscal year 1969 through fiscal year 1973. This means that priority was given to projects in those regions which, after 3 years of new-start decisions, were furthest away from fulfilling their 5-year programs.
592. lappuse - and utilities, dams, and addition of fish and wildlife facilities. This is offset to some degree by a decrease for reservoir and permanent operating equipment based on more detailed planning. Engineering and design and supervision and administration increased $680,000, based on a reanalysis of requirements. Senator
39. lappuse - The recommendations for fiscal year 1972 include five new planning starts which are all included in the fiscal year 1972-76 construction investment program. In order that projects will be available to meet the needs of each region, priority was given to new planning starts in those regions which do not now have a backlog of planned projects.
1017. lappuse - level increase, $130,000 is based on more detailed plans and estimates and $100,000 is due to reanalysis of requirements for engineering and design and supervision and
150. lappuse - Senator STENNIS. In the paragraph on comparison of Federal cost estimates, I note that the cost of this project increased by $133,000 over the last estimate of $25,000 based on 1939 prices and submitted to Congress in 1945. Since this project has apparently remained dormant so long, what awakened interest in it at this particular time?
173. lappuse - ADDITIONAL CAPABILITY Senator STENNIS. The request for fiscal year 1971 was $4,700,000 compared with a request for fiscal year 1972 of $1 million, and I note that the completion date has been delayed 1 year—that is, from June 1973 to June 1974. What is your full capability on this project for fiscal year 1972?
1002. lappuse - to our proceeding with land acquisition pending resolution of the problem prior to initiation of construction. INCREASED COSTS FOR BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS Senator STENNIS. I note that the cost of buildings, grounds, and utilities increased from