Reports of the Tax Court of the United States, 118. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 2002 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
6. lappuse
... Respondent asserts it does . Respondent focuses primarily on section 280C ( a ) and argues that a literal reading of that section always precludes a taxpayer from deducting wages to the extent of a TJC . Respondent acknowledges that a ...
... Respondent asserts it does . Respondent focuses primarily on section 280C ( a ) and argues that a literal reading of that section always precludes a taxpayer from deducting wages to the extent of a TJC . Respondent acknowledges that a ...
12. lappuse
... Respondent , in turn , acknowledges that the primary read- ing of the AMT provisions requires that AMTI be calculated by modifying taxable income by the items described in part VI . In a manner that is openly inconsistent with respondent's ...
... Respondent , in turn , acknowledges that the primary read- ing of the AMT provisions requires that AMTI be calculated by modifying taxable income by the items described in part VI . In a manner that is openly inconsistent with respondent's ...
22. lappuse
... respondent's determination on this issue . In so doing , we have considered all arguments made by the parties and have rejected those arguments not discussed herein as without merit . Accordingly , Decisions will be entered for respondent ...
... respondent's determination on this issue . In so doing , we have considered all arguments made by the parties and have rejected those arguments not discussed herein as without merit . Accordingly , Decisions will be entered for respondent ...
23. lappuse
... respondent's Appeals officer that respondent's proposed collection action may proceed . The issues for decision are : ( 1 ) Whether we have jurisdiction under section 6330 ( d ) ( 1 ) ( A ) to review respondent's determination to ...
... respondent's Appeals officer that respondent's proposed collection action may proceed . The issues for decision are : ( 1 ) Whether we have jurisdiction under section 6330 ( d ) ( 1 ) ( A ) to review respondent's determination to ...
24. lappuse
... Respondent did not accept any of these offers because respondent's revenue officer believed that respondent could collect about $ 38,635 from petitioners ' assets . The instructions for Form 656 , Offer in Compromise , which petitioners ...
... Respondent did not accept any of these offers because respondent's revenue officer believed that respondent could collect about $ 38,635 from petitioners ' assets . The instructions for Form 656 , Offer in Compromise , which petitioners ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
affd agreement alternative minimum tax amount Appeals officer apply assessment assets Beech Trucking benefit Blonien Burndy-Japan Burndy-US Caracci claim Clinpath stock Commissioner computing corporation deduction distribution documents EAPR election employees Estate fair market value Farm Federal income tax filed Finley Kumble Framatome Furukawa and Sumitomo Galena airport gross income home health Income Tax Regs income tax return interest expense interest income Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Code issue jurisdiction Leasing legislative history manufactured ment minimum tax notice of deficiency paid parties partner partnership percent peti petition petitioner's Petitioners contend Puerto Rico purposes pursuant regulations reimbursement Rept respect respondent's Revenue Procedures Rule shareholders shares sioner Sta-Home tax-exempt entities statute statutory stipulated summary judgment Sun Shipping supra T.C. Memo Tate & Lyle Tax Court tax liability taxable income taxpayer tion trade or business transfer Treeco United video games WHTC
Populāri fragmenti
179. lappuse - provides: If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise * * * Thus,
341. lappuse - Income Tax Regs. Fair market value is the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts. Sec. 1.170Al(c)(2), Income Tax Regs.
100. lappuse - "the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.'" United States v. Cartwright, 411 US
97. lappuse - the price at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts". United States v. Cartwright, 411 US 546, 551
316. lappuse - the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.
273. lappuse - When an act of Congress is appropriately challenged in the courts as not conforming to the constitutional mandate the judicial branch of the Government has only one duty,—to lay the article of the Constitution which is invoked beside the statute which is challenged and to decide
3. lappuse - SEC. 38. GENERAL BUSINESS CREDIT. (a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—There shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to the sum of— (1) the business credit carryforwards carried to such taxable year, (2) the amount of the current year business credit, plus (3) the business credit
309. lappuse - treaty and statute relate to the same subject, the courts will always endeavor to construe them so as to give effect to both, if that can be done without violating the language of either; but if the two are inconsistent, the one last in date will control the other, * * * [Whitney v. Robertson,
85. lappuse - No gain or loss shall be recognized to a corporation if such corporation is a party to a reorganization and exchanges property, in pursuance of the plan of reorganization, solely for stock or securities in another corporation a party to the reorganization.
169. lappuse - In making the foregoing determinations, the court shall review the whole record or those parts of it cited by a party, and due account shall be taken of the rule of prejudicial error. [Emphasis added.]