Coal, supplies of: position of the United States. views of Mr. Adams as to. Page. 11 11, 148 views of Count Sclopis as to views of Mr. Staempfli as to views of Viscount d'Itujaba as to. views of Mr. Adams as to views of Sir Alexander Cockburn as to Cockburn, Sir Alexander, (see table of contents, Fish, Mr.) his dissenting opinion commented on.. his claims to represent Great Britain his charges against the counsel of the United States his charges against the case of the United States.. admits the justice of the argument in the case of the United States his opinions.... thinks the treaty would have been better without the rules his views as to British unfriendliness as to acknowledgment of belligerency as to regulations of January, 1862 as to partiality in supplies of coal as to supplies of arms.. as to ships obtained from Great Britain. 11,74 11, 148 422 12,546 .12, 286, 547 12, 284 13 13 230-544 230 313 313 339 344 344 346 this opinion not read or made known before dissolution of tri- his comments upon Sir Alexander Cockburn's opinion.... his remarks upon the Italian, Swiss, and Brazilian arbitrators... his résumé of the positions maintained by Sir Alexander Cockburn 7, 28, 29, 38, 51 35 90 98 108 150 367 546 546 547 . 548 his opinion upon the effect of the controversy defining neutral rights and he thinks it important to note the views of Sir A. Cockburn.......... Georgia, case of Viscount d'Itajuba's opinion as to. Sir A. Cockburn's opinion as to. Government, neutral: G. when responsible for acts of subordinates . should possess adequate powers to maintain neutrality, (Cockburn)....... Great Britain, (see Municipal laws :) unfriendly course of, how treated in the case. government of had in consideration to ask withdrawal of case of United unfriendliness of, Count Sclopis's views as to.... 34, 37, 52 101 187 477 234 256 20 Sir Alexander Cockburn's opinion of the result of such comparison Indirect claims, (see Treaty of Washington,) (case of the United States:) 5 9, 62 9 10 33 255 307 278 53. continental press unanimous in support of right to present. Joint high commission, (see Indirect Claims,) (Treaty of Washington): 33, 53 33, 53, 101 268 12 271 33, 53, 101 Tribunal of arbitration, (see Award, Indirect claims): regarded as a judicial body.. its conduct shows that national differences may be settled by arbitration. organization of..... judgment upon indirect claims.. award and dissolution of.......... Tuscaloosa, the : decision as to..... Mr. Adams's opinion as to.. Sir A. Cockburn's opinion as to. Page. 2 14 15 21 49 38,52 181 473 Waite, Mr.: argument of..... W. 333 32 |