Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1946 "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
xx. lappuse
... issue presented by appellant has become res adjudicata . " APPEAL from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia . Affirmed . Mr. Newton A. Burgess ( Messrs . Lester G. Budlong and Ralph B. Stewart of counsel ) ...
... issue presented by appellant has become res adjudicata . " APPEAL from the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia . Affirmed . Mr. Newton A. Burgess ( Messrs . Lester G. Budlong and Ralph B. Stewart of counsel ) ...
1. lappuse
... issue of the priority of the Watson patent . We cannot accept that conclusion . In Daniels v . Coe , we said : " An interference determination settles not only the claims made , but all that could have been presented . " Following the ...
... issue of the priority of the Watson patent . We cannot accept that conclusion . In Daniels v . Coe , we said : " An interference determination settles not only the claims made , but all that could have been presented . " Following the ...
3. lappuse
... issue of the priority of the Watson patent . We cannot accept that conclusion . In Daniels v . Coe , we said : " An interference determination settles not only the claims made , but all that could have been presented . " Following the ...
... issue of the priority of the Watson patent . We cannot accept that conclusion . In Daniels v . Coe , we said : " An interference determination settles not only the claims made , but all that could have been presented . " Following the ...
8. lappuse
... issue attempt to extend the control of appellant over a process be- yond that which has been allowed by the Patent Office . There is no explanation as to the practical effect which these claims will have in extending appellant's control ...
... issue attempt to extend the control of appellant over a process be- yond that which has been allowed by the Patent Office . There is no explanation as to the practical effect which these claims will have in extending appellant's control ...
16. lappuse
... issue . It is clear from the exhibits that the mark here is part of the design of the bait . It cannot be said to have no utility unless the product has no utility . The fact that some other design might be equally useful does not pre ...
... issue . It is clear from the exhibits that the mark here is part of the design of the bait . It cannot be said to have no utility unless the product has no utility . The fact that some other design might be equally useful does not pre ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
64 USPQ acid affirmed alcohol alleged antitrust apparatus APPEAL from Patent appealed claims appellant appellant's appellant's application appellee appellee's Associate Judges Board of Appeals Board of Interference C. C. P. A. Patents cited coating Collie King Commissioner of Patents Company compounds comprising container Corporation counsel for appellant Court of Customs Customs and Patent cyclopentadiene decision decree defined delivered the opinion descriptive properties device disclosed disclosure district court esters fibers GARRETT glass Hartford Hartford-Empire Co HATFIELD hydrochloric acid Interference Examiners interference proceeding invention involved license liquid lubricating machine manufacture mark material means metal O'CONNELL operation Oral argument parties Patent Appeals Patent Office patentable subject matter petrolatum piperylene portion Presiding Judge pressure Primary Examiner prior art record reduction to practice reference registration reissue application rejected claims royalties Serial specification supra tests tion trade-mark United States Court United States Patent USPQ W. W. Cochran
Populāri fragmenti
2. lappuse - ... (b) Consists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof.
49. lappuse - ... which so nearly resemble a registered or known trade-mark owned and in use by another, and appropriated to merchandise of the same descriptive properties, as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers...
244. lappuse - But where the second action between the same parties is upon a different claim or demand, the judgment in the prior action operates as an estoppel only as to those matters in issue or points controverted, upon the determination of which the finding or verdict was rendered. In all cases, therefore, where it is sought to apply the estoppel of a judgment rendered upon one cause of action to matters arising in a suit upon a different cause of action, the inquiry must always be as to the point or question...
244. lappuse - In considering the operation of this judgment, it should be borne in mind, as stated by counsel, that there is a difference between the effect of a judgment as a bar or estoppel against the prosecution of a second action upon the same claim or demand, and its effect as an estoppel in another action, between the same parties, upon a different claim or cause of action.
2. lappuse - That no mark which consists merely in the name of an individual, firm, corporation, or association, not written, printed, impressed, or woven in some particular or distinctive manner...
560. lappuse - At the same time, a patent is an exception to the general rule against monopolies and to the right to access to a free and open market. The far-reaching social and economic consequences of a patent, therefore, give the public a paramount interest in seeing that patent monopolies spring from backgrounds free from fraud or other inequitable conduct and that such monopolies are kept within their legitimate scope.
313. lappuse - ... six months from the time at which it was passed and allowed, and notice thereof was sent to the applicant or his agent...
86. lappuse - That no mark by which the goods of the owner of the mark may be distinguished from other goods of the same class...
63. lappuse - Associate Judges. HATFIELD, Associate Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the subject matter defined by the counts in issue (Nos. 1 to 8, inclusive) to appellee, Paul G.
574. lappuse - This test is often difficult to apply; but its purpose is clear. Under this test, some substantial innovation is necessary, an innovation for which society is truly indebted to the efforts of the patentee.