No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 50.
75. lappuse
Articles by them were published , together with a comment by Professor Donald M. Gillmor of the School of Journalism , University of Minnesota , in BULL . Am . Soc'Y NEWSPAPER EDITORS , Dec./Jan . 1979 , at 6-9 .
Articles by them were published , together with a comment by Professor Donald M. Gillmor of the School of Journalism , University of Minnesota , in BULL . Am . Soc'Y NEWSPAPER EDITORS , Dec./Jan . 1979 , at 6-9 .
137. lappuse
181 In Lando , the plaintiff brought suit against the Columbia Broadcasting System , two of its employees , and the Atlantic Monthly , alleging that a program aired by the network and an article published by the magazine defamed him .
181 In Lando , the plaintiff brought suit against the Columbia Broadcasting System , two of its employees , and the Atlantic Monthly , alleging that a program aired by the network and an article published by the magazine defamed him .
152. lappuse
The Court believed that the decision to publish or not to publish was solely within the discretion of the editor and ... And , even if a rebuttal is published , it has been observed that " truth rarely catches up with a lie .
The Court believed that the decision to publish or not to publish was solely within the discretion of the editor and ... And , even if a rebuttal is published , it has been observed that " truth rarely catches up with a lie .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and Other Actions | 17 |
Union Contracts Employee Management | 47 |
Autortiesības | |
17 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
accompanying text supra action actual advertising allow amendment appears applied appropriate authority balancing basis BLIV Branzburg broadcast cable cause charged claims Commission Communications concern confidential consent considered constitutional criminal damages danger decision Defendant denied determine disclosure discussion dissenting doctrine effect fact fairness federal freedom granted held important included individual interest involved issue judge jury Justice less liability libel license limited majority malice mark material means ment newspaper official opinion party patent performance personal attack Plaintiff political present prior privilege protection published punishment question reasonable regulation relevant reporter result rule similar sources speech standard statement station statute Stewart Supp supra note Supreme Court television term tion tort trade trademark trial United violence York